Hi Willem, I can add different line-types, but wires are sometimes drawn before it becomes clear whether a parameter contains nothing, a single-item, a list or a tree, so it wouldn't be 100% reliable. Also, I'm hoping the "special attention and caution" will diminish as we improve the way GH handles trees.
I'll add an option to the menu in the meantime. -- David Rutten [email protected] Robert McNeel & Associates On Mar 20, 11:44 am, Willem <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be an option / good idea to have visually different > connection lines for branched data? > Just yesterday I first explored the workings of branched data, but > I feel (might go away overtime) that branched data needs special > attention and caution when connecting and parsing. > > How about a subtly different connection linetype indicating the data > stream is branched? > > Thinking about it, it might even be good to have 3 connection > linetypes (not to obvious, but noticeably different): > - for single data / interval / point / plane etc.. > - for a list / stream of data > - for branched data > > I imagine a solid line for single data (current) > A dashed line ( with short dash intervals) for streams > A 'parallel' line type for branched data (eg 3 parallel lines, kind > of a 90 degree dash) > > Willem
