Like so: http://groups.google.com/group/grasshopper3d/web/DistinctColours.jpg
? -- David Rutten [email protected] Robert McNeel & Associates On Mar 24, 10:19 pm, mario <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andy!!!...thanks for your reply. > mmm...that's not really what i'm looking for... > sorry if i didn't make myself clear...i'll try now. > A few months ago i bumped into this > website.http://tedngai.net/ecoMesh2Rhi2.html > great idea!, to populate a srf with a family of components according > to sun incidence...not curvature. > so say...you have five colors (red, orange, yellow, purple and blue) > gotten from the sun analysis and you have 5 components (a,b,c,d,e > drawn in rhino) > my intention is to tell gh that. > a=red > b=orange > c=yellow > d=purple > e=blue. > > at this moment, i'm doing it by hand, basically populating all the > components and then deleting the overlaps....but it's a pain!!! > > i hope you get the idea > thanks again. > > On Mar 24, 3:44 pm, Rchitekt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi mario, > > It is possible. This was discussed in a previous thread a few months > > ago.http://groups.google.com/group/grasshopper3d/browse_thread/thread/385... > > Halfway down the thread, Visose posts a screenshot of a surface that > > has a gradient color based on surface curvature... he then places some > > surfaces in the areas where the curvature is needed. I think this is > > what your looking for. > > -Andy > > > On Mar 24, 11:20 am, mario <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi guys!....thank you for your work!!! > > > I was wondering if it's possible to place different components > > > according to rgb values...i was thinking about using sun analysis > > > definition, to then place differentiated family types of components > > > considering their sun exposure. > > > thanks > > > > On Mar 24, 12:01 pm, Rchitekt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Patrick, > > > > I agree with Rajaa. It always helps to get another perspective on > > > > things, and your first version was very good. I hope you continue > > > > your work. > > > > Best, > > > > Andy > > > > > On Mar 24, 6:31 am, Rajaa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Patrick, > > > > > > I apologize for not making a post about the scripting primer any > > > > > earlier. > > > > > Your work is still very valuable and having a multiple point of > > > > > reference helps cover the subject much better. > > > > > > I will be very interested in your feedback and look forward to your > > > > > future contributions. > > > > > > On Mar 23, 10:14 pm, Patrick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Andy and Rajaa, > > > > > > > Fantastic! Thanks for the hard work > > > > > > > This saves me a lot of work with the scripting primer I have been > > > > > > creating. (I wish I had known...) I will drop my one, and tell my > > > > > > students to switch to this one. > > > > > > > *https://community.nus.edu.sg/ddm/index.php?q=node/77 > > > > > > > Patrick > > > > > > > On Mar 24, 2:29 am, Rchitekt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > The second edition of the Grasshopper Primer is out and it > > > > > > > wouldn't > > > > > > > have been possible without the tremendous contribution from Rajaa > > > > > > > Issa. Rajaa needs no introduction here, but she has provided > > > > > > > over 70 > > > > > > > pages dedicated to scripting advanced components in Grasshopper. > > > > > > > We're both really excited about this release as it provides a much > > > > > > > more comprehensive guide than the first edition at almost 160 > > > > > > > pages! > > > > > > > You can download your copy of the Primer and the source files that > > > > > > > accompany the manual > > > > > > > here:http://www.liftarchitects.com/journal/2009/3/23/the-grasshopper-prime... > > > > > > > Thanks again to everyone here on the forum and I'd love to hear > > > > > > > any > > > > > > > feedback you might have. Enjoy. > > > > > > > -Andy Payne- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -
