Yeah!!! i Guess this is how progress is done, test and test again. I really enjoy it
Thaks and keep the good work On Mar 26, 5:25 pm, David Rutten <[email protected]> wrote: > Glad you found the problem yourself Claudio. 0.6 has probably broken > many old files, and I assume that upcoming releases will do so as > well. Until this data-tree thing settles a bit, beta-testing > Grasshopper will be an arduous job. > > -- > David Rutten > [email protected] > Robert McNeel & Associates > > On Mar 26, 11:26 am, claudioarchi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Found the problem The item components needs to be flattened in the > > base list.. > > > Thank anyway > > > On Mar 26, 2:09 pm, claudioarchi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Answer to me. I think it has to do with how GH manages tree data. Work > > > in progress. By the way I've uploaded the definition. > > > > On Mar 26, 1:30 pm, claudioarchi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hello Guys > > > > > I've reopened (in GH revision 7) a definition that triangulates a > > > > surface and tag each panel with a specific name and numer. Very > > > > similar to the GH definitions for panelization in Designanalyze web > > > > site. > > > > http://www.designalyze.com/2009/01/16/surface-panelization-definition/ > > > > The problem is that the definition works until it gets to tag. the > > > > panels they all have the right name (string) but also the same number. > > > > I'm using the centroid point of the surface(panels) to Tag the name. > > > > Any ideas... > > > > > Also what is this Draw fancy wires under view menu. I have dashed > > > > lines and plein ones...? > > > > > Thank you
