Hi Linwood, the processor pipelines and its rule language are supposed to replace Drools, extractors, static fields, and possibly stream rules in the long run.
Cheers, Jochen On Monday, 1 August 2016 22:28:33 UTC+2, Linwood Ferguson wrote: > > And by the way -- rearranging the order made the pipeline I had set up as > a test work fine, so I did get by that. But still curious where these > should be viewed in the greater context, what they should be considered to > replace (if anything) for someone with no legacy to migrate? > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:55:19 PM UTC-4, Jochen Schalanda wrote: >> >> Hi Linwood, >> >> you can lookup and change the order of the traditional filters (such as >> extractors) and the new message processor pipeline in the web interface on >> the System -> Configurations -> Message Processors Configuration page. >> >> Cheers, >> Jochen >> >> On Monday, 1 August 2016 21:49:08 UTC+2, Linwood Ferguson wrote: >>> >>> If a pipeline is connected to the default stream, does that mean it runs >>> before the extractors? >>> >>> Have been experimenting, and I do not seem to see (and the simulator >>> does not show) fields created in an extractor associated with input source >>> when it arrives in the pipeline. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Graylog Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to graylog2+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graylog2/ed503585-e0b7-404f-9a7c-6cf88e7ea017%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
