On Jan 23, 2:53 am, esquifit <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, I suppose this means that I'll have to go through the nearly 200 > scripts I have installed and check one by one whether there is a > metadata mismatch between the script and config.xml, and manually > update the affected scripts to reflect the reality before attempting > the upgrade to 0.9. Otherwise I could potentially have massive > problems. If my understanding is correct, this is certainly something > it should be informed about in the GM blog at the minimum, and also at > UMO.
Do you really plan on editing all 200 of your scripts? How about just adding the @include rules to the scripts you actually plan on editing. > PS: I change metadata of 3rd part scripts very often because they tend > to be too permissive, for example "http:*.youtube.*/*", which to the > effects of security amounts to the same as "http:*". My own scripts > also change continuously, since they are under permanent optimization. Contact the original author of the script and tell him that his @include rules are unsafe. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.
