I'm guessing @resource should act the same then? In any case, at the moment both @require and @resource work for files on the disk, and based on questions on Stack Overflow etc. it is a "hack" that is used for personal scripts (i.e. those not intended to be distributed).
Will this "hack" eventually be "fixed"/"closed"? Of course, I hope not... In any case, do you perhaps know why some of my scripts work fine when adding new @require blocks while others don't? On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Anthony Lieuallen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Gary <[email protected]> wrote: > > I can easily use @require test.js (the test.js being a local file, > located > > in the same directory as the script) > > The value for @require should be a URL, where the resource can be > downloaded from. Not a path on disk. If you edit an existing file to > specify a path on disk, Greasemonkey will try to download that as a > URL, fail, and then the resource will not be available. > > http://wiki.greasespot.net/Metadata_Block#.40require > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/greasemonkey-users/jllCw442IP4/unsubscribe > . > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
