Am still getting an error saying "Invalid File Type" when trying to upload an userscript. I tried multiple scripts. Even tried from github directly: https://github.com/jerone/UserScripts/raw/master/Github_Pull_Request_From/Github_Pull_Request_From.user.js
On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:10:30 AM UTC+2, Eric Gardner wrote: > > Yea like I said, I was/am migrating servers. I was using an Amazon EC2 > solution because of its fast setup/low hourly price. But in the end, it > still wsn't worth it so I upgraded to a quad core vps. but the damn thing > came with cpanel, which is a pain in the ass when you aren't reselling. > > The site is back up for the time being, but I still have to move my SSL > certificate to the new server. Additionally, I had a bunch of scripts that > would sync with a private git repo to keep everything neat and versioned. I > also had a script that would do nightly backups. So I still have a a lot of > stuff move/rewrite for the new filesystem. > > But for the time being, I have Diff Eq and Cal III homework to do before I > go to work. So it may be a while before I finish the move, and get back to > developing. > > On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 4:06:55 PM UTC-5, jerone wrote: >> >> Site down?! >> >> On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:45:54 AM UTC+2, Eric Gardner wrote: >>> >>> Oh well that's weird. It could be an encoding error. I am having >>> problems with my current server, and I am in the progress of migrating. I >>> went ahead and added a few mime types and updated the validator. But I >>> really don't know why it would do that. >>> >>> I actually started writing that in, but I have prioritized core >>> functionality. As soon as I have worked out all the bugs, I will finish the >>> github syncing scripts. >>> >>> I do not rewrite any meta information (currently). I feel it is the >>> author's responsibility/right to maintain meta information. I actually hate >>> how GreasyFork doesn't let you opt-out of rewriting. I understand that a >>> script could have an update url that updates the code to something harmful >>> without the user's knowledge. However, there are easier ways to screw with >>> your users. You could just write your own interpreter and do an >>> xmlHttpRequest for malicious code to execute. >>> >>> Eventually I will update my validator to check for known malicious >>> resources and remove them if necessary. But I feel that's where a host >>> site's power should end. >>> >>> On Monday, August 25, 2014 5:20:16 AM UTC-5, jerone wrote: >>>> >>>> Trying to upload a script, am getting error saying "Invalid File Type" >>>> while it's a .user.js file. >>>> >>>> One feature I really miss and other sites (OpenUserJS & GreasyFork) do >>>> have implemented is importing and syncing with Github. I don't want to >>>> upload my scripts every time to all sites when I make an update on Github. >>>> >>>> Question: do you rewrite the scripts like GreasyFork does? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sunday, August 24, 2014 8:30:44 AM UTC+2, Eric Gardner wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Oh lol well I didn't think anyone would try to sign up so I never >>>>> enabled new user creation. I went ahead and manually confirmed your >>>>> account, Give it a try and let me know how you like it >>>>> >>>>> On Saturday, August 23, 2014 12:12:19 PM UTC-5, jerone wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Just wanted to try it, but I'm not getting my confirmation mail. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Saturday, August 23, 2014 11:21:39 AM UTC+2, Eric Gardner wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I have been developing a new userscript hosting site and I'm >>>>>>> looking for some feedback from other developers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *http://myuserjs.org <http://myuserjs.org>* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What makes it unique: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Host resources with your script (text, css, other scripts) >>>>>>> - Collect advanced statistics on script behavior (page load >>>>>>> time, script execution time, errors, etc...) >>>>>>> - Intuitive API for manual update checking, and statistic >>>>>>> reporting (and does not require privileged functions like >>>>>>> xmlHttpRequest) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The site is not ready to be used by script authors around the world, >>>>>>> but I would love it if some of y'all could look around the site and >>>>>>> give me >>>>>>> some suggestions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The following is still being worked on: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Site API is still being worked on. >>>>>>> - Statistic viewing engine still needs ability to isolate >>>>>>> specific arguments (ex: only view stats submitted when error=1) >>>>>>> - Comment section for scripts is still under construction >>>>>>> - The overall look and feel needs an update (I'm a programmer, >>>>>>> not a graphic designer) >>>>>>> - General efficiency updates needed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But for the most part, all the core functions of the site work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Look at this example script >>>>>>> <http://myuserjs.org/script/jgjake2/Cracked.com_Enhancer>. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for your time, >>>>>>> Eric >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
