Kerala police and Aristotle

VR Jararaj
04/10/05
the pioneer

http://dailypioneer.com/indexn12.asp?main_variable=KOCHI&file_name=KOCHI16%2Etxt&counter_img= 16


Get Mr Aristotle right. Every man has 32 teeth in the mouth. Every policeman is a man. Therefore, every policeman has 32 teeth in mouth.

Theoretically and physiologically, this is a fact. But when it comes to actual policing practice, this proposition is childish; especially in the case of Kerala Police. Or so it seems. My brother used to tell me this. That is why he resigned from his police job and got some harmless job, where he does not need to be corrupted by money or muscle. And there is no need of an Emergency for our cops to get extra teeth. Think of Udayakumar of Thiruvananthapuram, the most recent example of police extra-teethedness. I am sure DGP Ramon Sreevastava would not like this.

But sorry, our police system is like that - though I admit there could be exceptions individually. Our DGP keeps on saying police should become a community force. He once said that a time must come when people would walk in to police stations fearlessly. By saying so, he is admitting that presently our law-enforcement system is not people-friendly.

The extra teeth of Kerala Police is not a matter of individual aberration of particular policemen. Our police system bears that quality. So Udayakumars would get killed or they would keep on coughing till they reach the grave with persecution-induced asthma and other pulmonary trouble like my good friend CK did. Here is an example of how it works.

About 10.45 pm, August 11. A junior journalist, a devout Muslim, and his senior colleague reach on a motorbike in front of a restaurant at the traffic roundabout at Palarivattom, Kochi. The junior journalist brakes the vehicle in front of the restaurant to see a police vehicle come to a screeching halt just near him (I have seen this happening in Delhi in the fag-end of the 80s when police would chase terrorists or suspected terrorists). As the two-some disembark from the bike, the officer sitting on the left of the police jeep roars to his driver: "Hey, ask him to come here."

The driver, a much subdued man, calls the bike-driver to the left of the jeep. First question: "Have you taken liquor?" As the face is very close, the officer suddenly understands that the young man could not be harassed on that matter. He was clean, a God-fearing Muslim, who has never drunk in his life. So the howl changes: "Where are the papers?" All the papers are in order. "What about the insurance?" That document is produced. "What about pollution?" The certificate is produced.

By now the officer is in total despair. He calls his aide in the vilest of tones, "Edo, just check whether he is drunk." The constable calls the young man to the back of the jeep. Obviously, the intention is not to check for smell of alcohol, because that could be done in front of the officer, and the officer is already convinced that the guy has not taken liquor. Both the colleagues walk to the back of the jeep, which act is not foreseen by the constable or the officer.

Now, out of wits, the constable asks the young man to blow air right into his nose: No trace of the desired smell. The constable calls to his officer in the humblest of tones, "No, sir," as though he is apologising for an unpardonable crime. The roar comes back, "Check thoroughly." Again, the constable answers in the negative. The officer, disappointment writ large on his face, hands the documents back. There is no advice. As the young man prepares to leave, the officer roars again at his deputy: "Stop him. It was a mini-lorry.

The young journalist makes a thorough enquiry the next morning. Was there any tip-off to the effect that a terrorist, any hard-core criminal or a drug-peddler was coming that way? No. Was there any special instruction to the officer to stop all the bike-riders? Negative.

Are the tyres of police vehicles, bought with public money, meant to be burned by chasing bike-drivers by a police officer haunted by a colossal ego? "We don't approve such acts." Can the police violate rights of peaceful citizens by jumping on them? A top cop of the city answers that it is not done. Then what was the police officer doing? Plain harassment, what else? And when such over-teethed officers get a poor robbery case in their hands, Udayakumars happen.

Community policing, Kerala style.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
"Ours is a battle not for wealth or for power.
It is a battle for freedom. It is a battle for the reclamation of human personality."
- Dr BR Ambedkar
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to