Damodar, u estimate or not but u have to help him find out which is true...*Everything is possible or Nothing is impossible. * (The Mumabi- Pune route is tricky. In Bheja Fry, Vinay Pathak. travels in a bus in the same route :))....Even Delhi philosophers couldn’t help him, since he is a non believer, god also can't help him.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:11 PM, damodar prasad <damodar.pra...@gmail.com>wrote: > aayo..Funny Games changed my perception of the world. Hence, NO ESTIMATION. > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, sreenivas v.p > <sreenivas_...@yahoo.co.in>wrote: > >> if u want fun, help me clarifying one of my long standing doubt . >> i was travelling in a bus from mumbai to pune . inside the bus , it is >> written in a poster >> like this " *Everything is possible*" . >> >> but even after reading that poster repeatedly , i could not convince >> myself that everything is possible . everytime i say "everything is possible >> ", the impossibility of something haunted me . >> after reaching pune , i asked my friends . some people including me felt >> that it is better to say " *nothing is impossible* " but some were of >> the opinion that " everything is possible " gives more confidence . >> we even discussed this with a professor of philosophy in delhi university >> but nobody could reach an agreement . >> this may see very silly to u but i am still confused . >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --- On *Thu, 2/4/09, damodar prasad <damodar.pra...@gmail.com>* wrote: >> >> >> From: damodar prasad <damodar.pra...@gmail.com> >> Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: Was Einstein Wrong? >> To: greenyouth@googlegroups.com >> Date: Thursday, 2 April, 2009, 7:45 PM >> >> >> sorry, over-estimate! >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, damodar prasad >> <damodar.pra...@gmail.com<http://in.mc87.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=damodar.pra...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >>> I don't want to underestimate you, sreenivas. Have fun! >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:37 PM, sreenivas v.p >>> <sreenivas_...@yahoo.co.in<http://in.mc87.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sreenivas_...@yahoo.co.in> >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Damodar , >>>> >>>> I wrote that as an introduction , I think three theories changed our >>>> perception about ourselves and the universe . >>>> 1. Theory of relativity >>>> 2. Marxism >>>> 3. darwin's theory of evolution . >>>> the world before these men of genius has no singificance . >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- On *Thu, 2/4/09, damodar prasad >>>> <damodar.pra...@gmail.com<http://in.mc87.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=damodar.pra...@gmail.com> >>>> >* wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> From: damodar prasad >>>> <damodar.pra...@gmail.com<http://in.mc87.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=damodar.pra...@gmail.com> >>>> > >>>> Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: Was Einstein Wrong? >>>> To: >>>> greenyouth@googlegroups.com<http://in.mc87.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=greenyo...@googlegroups.com> >>>> Date: Thursday, 2 April, 2009, 7:16 PM >>>> >>>> >>>> Srinivas, >>>> >>>> *like Marxism , another theory that changed our perception about the >>>> world was Einstein's theory of relativity . >>>> >>>> did you write the above sentence? or the sydney team.. >>>> >>>> >>>> * On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:57 PM, sreenivas v.p < >>>> sreenivas_...@yahoo.co.in<http://in.mc87.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sreenivas_...@yahoo.co.in> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> * It outhrown the newtonian conception of the world and lead >>>>> to revolutionary discoveries in the study of the universe . But was >>>>> Einstein wrong ? * >>>>> *See the below report . * >>>>> >>>>> SYDNEY -- A team of Australian scientists has proposed that the speed >>>>> of light may not be a constant, a revolutionary idea that could unseat one >>>>> of the most cherished laws of modern physics -- Einstein's theory of >>>>> relativity. >>>>> The team, led by theoretical physicist Paul Davies of Sydney's >>>>> Macquarie University, say it is possible that the speed of light has >>>>> slowed >>>>> over billions of years. >>>>> If so, physicists will have to rethink many of their basic ideas about >>>>> the laws of the universe. >>>>> "That means giving up the theory of relativity and E-mc squared and all >>>>> that sort of stuff," Davies told Reuters. >>>>> "But of course it doesn't mean we just throw the books in the bin, >>>>> because it's in the nature of scientific revolution that the old theories >>>>> become incorporated in the new ones." >>>>> Davies, and astrophysicists Tamara Davis and Charles Lineweaver from >>>>> the University of New South Wales published the proposal in the August 8 >>>>> edition of scientific journal *Nature.* (it also appeared in latest >>>>> "Scientific american " magazine ). >>>>> The suggestion that the speed of light can change is based on data >>>>> collected by UNSW astronomer John Webb, who posed a conundrum when he >>>>> found >>>>> that light from a distant quasar, a star-like object, had absorbed the >>>>> wrong >>>>> type of photons from interstellar clouds on its 12 billion year journey to >>>>> earth. >>>>> Davies said fundamentally Webb's observations meant that the structure >>>>> of atoms emitting quasar light was slightly but ever so significantly >>>>> different to the structure of atoms in humans. >>>>> The discrepancy could only be explained if either the electron charge, >>>>> or the speed of light, had changed. >>>>> "But two of the cherished laws of the universe are the law that >>>>> electron charge shall not change and that the speed of light shall not >>>>> change, so whichever way you look at it we're in trouble," Davies said. >>>>> To establish which of the two constants might not be that constant >>>>> after all, Davies' team resorted to the study of black holes, mysterious >>>>> astronomical bodies that suck in stars and other galactic features. >>>>> They also applied another dogma of physics, the second law of >>>>> thermodynamics, which Davies summarizes as "you can't get something for >>>>> nothing." >>>>> After considering that a change in the electron charge over time would >>>>> violate the sacrosanct second law of thermodynamics, they concluded that >>>>> the >>>>> only option was to challenge the constancy of the speed of light. >>>>> More study of quasar light is needed in order to validate Webb's >>>>> observations, and to back up the proposal that light speed may vary, a >>>>> theory Davies stresses represents only the first chink in the armor of the >>>>> theory of relativity. >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. >>>>> >>>>> <http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_messenger_6/*http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. >>>> >>>> <http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_messenger_6/*http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------ >> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. >> >> <http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_messenger_6/*http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
