The mandate for inclusive
India<http://indigenousindia.blogspot.com/2009/05/mandate-for-inclusive-india.html>
By Gladson Dungdung
17 May, 2009

The biggest festival of the Indian democracy has come to an end. The voters
have given their mandates to the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) for the
good governance, inclusive development and secular India. A major shift has
been noticed in this election is that the first time in India, the majority
of the voters have voted on the issues of development, good governance and
inclusive politics by putting aside the caste and communal politics. This
change has been brought by the youth who played a vital role in the general
election inspired by the Obama’s ‘change campaign’ in America. In these
circumstances, the biggest loser of the game is none other than self
declared iron man, PM in waiting and self made powerful leader L K Advani,
whose dream of entering into the India history as the Prime Minister even
for a moment has been completely washed away. Now he is preparing for the
‘political sanyas’ (retirement), which would be the most painful for him
because he can not even sing ‘Ram Dhun’ to comfort himself as he has
promised during the election campaign that he will not say “Jai Shree Ram”
till the construction of the Ram Temple at Ayodhya.

It would be interesting to know that why the self declared iron man lost the
battle even after putting each and every effort to make it possible. The
main reason is that the majority of Indians who believe in the ethos of
secularism, inclusiveness, pluralistic, peaceful and just society would
never accept L K Advani as the prime minister of India. Precisely, because
Advani is known as a hardline Hindu leader, who flamed the communal fire in
the country in early 90s, which led to the communal riots in the country in
1992, Gujarat riot in 2002, Kandhamal communal violence in 2009 and list
goes on. Interestingly, the major communal violence was taken place only in
the BJP ruled or supported states and instead of punishing the perpetrators,
they were awarded. The major contribution of Advani for the country is
‘communal violence’ therefore the secular voters voted against the so-called
iron man. The BJP would have gain more seats if it would have not declared
Advani as its PM candidate.

Secondly, what cost the Advani most is the BJP’s negative campaign. The BJP
had released its election manifesto with the good promises for the urban
middle class and the poor but the party failed to take it to the masses. The
right from the beginning of the election campaign, the issues of common men
became secondary for the party and the Advani and PM post took the centre
stage of the campaign. The BJP also failed to give new hope and aspiration
to the youth and it created extreme fear and uncertain atmosphere in the
country in the name of terrorism, inflation and recession for ensuring the
vote bank and came up with the slogan of “Bhai Ho” to counter the Congress’s
slogan ‘Jai Ho’. The party also lost the real issues and went back to the
issues of Ram Temple, Article 370 and Common Civil Code, which was kept
aside and not required for the moment as the BJP’s hardline voters would
have not changed their minds in any cost. On the other hand, Advani also
failed to take issues to the people and started personal attack. He
regularly attacked Dr. Manmohan Singh by coining him as the weakest prime
minister of India and projected himself as the most powerful leader of the
Country. He also tried to copy the Obama’s internet campaign and suggested
to debate in public like what Americans do. But all these went against of
the BJP.

Thirdly, the BJP’s dubious role on the issue of Varun Gandhi’s hate politics
cost the party. The party left Varun in isolation immediately after his hate
speech in Pillibhit was appeared in media but when Advani met the RSS chief
Bhagavat, the party took u turn and stood behind Varun. The party also
attacked the constitutional body the ‘Election Commission’, when it
suggested the party for dropping Varun Gandhi from contesting election after
going through the CD of hate speech. Though Varun himself won the Pillibhit
constituency but party lost the Muslim as well as Hindu voters who believe
in inclusive politics.

Fourthly, the voters also measured the BJP’s performance as there is a major
gap between rhetoric and reality of the party. Though the star campaigners
of the party including L K Advani cried foul on the issues of terrorism but
during the NDA regime the terrorists attacked on the Parliament, the Red
Fort, the Akhsardham Temple, and the JK Assembly but neither Bajpayee took
the responsibility nor Advani resign. The terrorists were also treated like
guests and escorted by then the External Affairs Minister Yashwant Singh to
Kandhar. Similarly, after the Gujarat riot, CM Narendra Modi was made a hero
by the both Advani and Bajpayee. On the other hand, the Congress took
stringent action against its own three ministers including the Home Minister
Shivraj Patel and mobilized the world community against terrorism after the
Mumbai attack. On the issue of inflation, the UPA government took enough
steps to control it by cutting the oil prices, relief in service taxes and
many other areas. On the other hand, the Indian voters have not forgotten of
buying onion at the price of Rs 50 per kg first time in the Indian history
during the NDA regime.

Fifthly, the BJP as a party as well as its alliance could not stand united
during the election. In the beginning of the campaign the issue of Jetaly vs
Mittal came up and took almost a week to address, which also paved the way
in creating the issue of leadership crisis between L.K. Advani and Narendra
Modi, created and spread a lot of confusion among the voters. Similarly, the
NDA alliance was also collapsed. The TDP chief Chandrababu Naidu was not
ready to accept Advani as the prime ministerial candidate of the NDA
therefore he left the alliance but the biggest setback for the NDA was the
divorce between BJP and BJD in the middle of campaign led to a major loss
for the alliance.

Finally, the arch rival of the BJP, the Congress was responding BJP strongly
through the positive campaign with the slogan of “Bharat Nirman” (building
India). The Congress also had numbers of achievements to show the voters
which begins from the Right to information Act for every one, National Rural
Employment Guarantee Act for the poor, Forest Rights Act for Adivasis and
other Forest Dweller Communities, welfare schemes for minorities, weaved
loan for farmers, Mid-Day-Meal, National Rural Health Mission, Balika
Samridhi Yojna, and the list goes on with the Sixth Pay commission for the
middle class employee families. Besides, the Indian Railway is booming with
the net profit of Rs. 90,000 crore and the country was able to face the
recession with prompt actions of the government. In the issues of terrorism
and the national security, the Congress has taken a clear stance against
terrorism and it has also passed legislation for the national security. The
major change was the youth mobilization by Rahul Gandhi, which translated
into Rahul magic, created a huge impact in the election. The charismatic
leadership of the Congress president Sonia Gandhi, clean image of Dr.
Manmohan Singh and effective campaign by Priyanka was good enough to
mobilize the Indian voters for burying the dream of so-called iron man
Advani.

The major question comes to one’s mind is that where the BJP will go from
here as the future of the party seems to be in the dark? The youth of India
do not want to live in fear, insecurity and uncertainty. They need inclusive
progress India, where they can enjoy, breathe in healthy atmosphere and live
with peace. Therefore if the BJP wants to win the hearts of Indian voters
especially the young voters, the party has to change its exclusiveness and
go for the inclusive politics, which would be extremely difficult for the
party. But the BJP must introspect on its ideology and stance because a huge
youth brigade of the congress is ready to bring back the Congress era under
the magic leadership of Rahul and Priyanka by giving youth hope and
aspiration for the progressive, modern and inclusive India.

Gladson Dungdung is a Human Rights Activist and Writer based at Ranchi,
Jharkhand. He can be contacted at [email protected],
[email protected]

-- 
---------------------------------------
Gladson Dungdung
HR Activist and Writer
Email: [email protected]
www.indigenousindia.blogspot.com
www.newswing.com
www.indigenousphoto.blogspot.com
www.crejjharkhand.blogspot.com
www.jipf.blotspot.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to