Hypocrisy Of The ‘Poverty Line’: Seven Times
Below The Stipulated Minimum wage!

*By Peoples Union for Democratic Rights*

26 September, 2011
*Countercurrents.org*

PUDR wishes to draw public attention to the recent controversy where
Planning Commission informed the Supreme Court that anyone earning more than
Rs 32 in urban and Rs 26 in rural areas per day is considered above the
poverty line. Article 43 of India’s Constitution lays down that “(t)he state
shall endeavour to secure by suitable legislation or economic organisation
or in any other way to all workers, agricultural, industrial or otherwise,
work, a living wage conditions of work ensuring a decent standard of life
and full enjoyment of leisure and social and cultural opportunities”.
India’s low ranking in major human development indices and the fact that an
overwhelming majority of the population continue to be denied this
conceptualisation of what would be considered a “fair wage”, raises
disturbing questions with regard to the official standpoint on poverty.

In 1957 at the 15th Indian Labour Conference (ILC) moves were made towards
setting down norms for fixing Minimum Wage, a euphemism for a “living
wage.’’ The 15th ILC recommended that in the first place the standard
working class family should be taken to mean husband, wife and two children
below the age of 14 yrs. Second, minimum food requirement should be
calculated on the basis of 2700 calories daily per adult man, 2160 for woman
and 1620 for the child. Further clothing requirement of 72 yards for a
family per annum would be added while housing allowance corresponding to the
minimum area provided for under the governments industrial housing schemes.
Lastly fuel, lighting and other items of expenditure should constitute 20
percent of the total Minimum Wage.

While the Government did not accept these recommendations, Supreme Court
approved these norms through its judgement in the case of U.Unichoyi v.
State of Kerala (AIR 1962 SC 12) and thereby acquiring the force of law
behind it. The apex court through its judgement in Workmen v. Reptakos Brett
& Co Ltd (AIR 1992 SC 504) added a sixth norm – 25 percent of the total
Minimum Wage was supposed to cover children’s education, medical treatment,
recreation etc. The Court observed that these six norms would be nothing
more than Minimum Wage at “subsistence level” which the workers must get “at
all times and under all circumstances”.

Adherence to the six norms, let alone the five norms laid down by the 15th
ILC, has been followed in breach. As a "living wage", at current wage rates
declared under Minimum Wage Act, comes to Rs 247 per day for unskilled. Rs
32 touted by the Planning Commission as "below poverty line" is less than
seven times the Minimum Wage which itself is a "subsistence wage". Thus
Minimum Wage is seven times that of BPL rate. What this implies is that mass
of our people are being robbed of their right to life by artificial
constructions of poverty line. PUDR reiterates that the letter and spirit of
Article 43 which forms part of the Directive Principles of State Policy be
the basis for providing basic requirement to all citizens of India so that
their right to a life of dignity and liberty can be ensured.
Harish Dhawan and Paramjeet Singh
Secretaries PUDR


http://www.countercurrents.org/pudr260911.htm


You cannot build anything on the foundations of caste. You cannot build up a
nation, you cannot build up a morality. Anything that you will build on the
foundations of caste will crack and will never be a whole.
-AMBEDKAR



http://venukm.blogspot.com

http://www.shelfari.com/kmvenuannur

http://kmvenuannur.livejournal.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to