Anti-women remarks: Family court matters taken away from Judge
PTI

http://www.thehindu.com/news/states/karnataka/article3873676.ece?homepage=true

Following an outrage over certain remarks made by a judge of Karnataka High
Court on women in an open court, all family court matters, including child
custody and guardianship, have been shifted from him and another judge.

The matters have been shifted to the court of Justices K.L. Manjunath and
V. Suri Appa Rao from the court of Justice Bhakthavatsala and Justice B.S.
Indrakala.

There was no other change in the subjects listed against the name of
Justices Bhakthavatsala and Indrakala. The changes will come into effect
from September 10, official sources said.

The shifting of the matters comes in the wake of the outrage expressed by
women lawyers and activists to certain oral remarks made by Justice
Bhakthavatsala in an open court.

The modification of subjects assigned to the Judges of the high court
normally happens to those judges who return from their sittings at the
circuit benches.

Karnataka has two circuit benches — in Gulbarga and Dharwad. Subjects are
normally modified after summer vacation until Dussehra holidays, post
Dussehra holidays to Christmas holidays and Christmas holidays to summer
holidays.

The unusual modification of taking away just one subject relating to family
court matters is an indication of the impact of the campaign that went
right up to the level of the Chief Justice of India.

Justice Bhaktavatsala had on Friday expressed his displeasure about the
reports appearing in certain sections of the media about the oral
observations made by him while hearing a marriage dispute.

While hearing a case, Justice Bhaktavatsala rapped the media for
“misinterpreting” his oral observations and said “I have not permitted to
beat wife. I never approved such kind of things... In the interest of
protecting family, marriages I put forth my efforts... I asked couples to
forget their past and live their life peacefully... But reports are
otherwise... While hearing family matters we try to conciliate between
parties. The papers have taken in a different perspective.”

Certain statements made by him last month had appeared in a section of
press wherein while hearing a matrimonial dispute he was reported to have
told a woman lawyer that she was unfit to argue the matter as she was
unmarried.

Another observation by him was while advising a techie couple who
reconciled for the sake of their child, wherein he asked the wife as to why
she was talking about the being beaten by her husband, when he could take
good care of her as he was doing well in his business.

Women advocates led by noted senior lawyer and former Chairperson of
Karnataka State Commission For Women Pramila Nesargi had recently given a
representation to Chief Justice Vikramajit Sen expressing serious objection
to the remarks passed by Justice Bhaktavatsala.


-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to