http://tehelka.com/ishrat-jahan-encounter-accused-cop-says-modi-knew-of-conspiracy/#.UcxCZFb3tpg.gmail


   Ishrat Jahan encounter: Accused cop says Modi knew of
conspiracy<http://tehelka.com/ishrat-jahan-encounter-accused-cop-says-modi-knew-of-conspiracy/?singlepage=1#>
*The CBI will probe claim that the Gujarat chief minister was informed
beforehand of the extrajudicial killings. An exclusive report by Rana Ayyub*
 [image: Rana Ayyub]
 Rana Ayyub <http://tehelka.com/author/rana>
2013-07-06 , Issue 27 Volume 10

<http://www.printfriendly.com/print?url=http://tehelka.com/ishrat-jahan-encounter-accused-cop-says-modi-knew-of-conspiracy/>


<http://tehelka.com/ishrat-jahan-encounter-accused-cop-says-modi-knew-of-conspiracy/?singlepage=1#><http://tehelka.com/ishrat-jahan-encounter-accused-cop-says-modi-knew-of-conspiracy/?singlepage=1#><http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300&winname=addthis&pub=ra-51824d0a602ef492&source=tbx32-300&lng=en-US&s=google_plusone_share&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftehelka.com%2Fishrat-jahan-encounter-accused-cop-says-modi-knew-of-conspiracy%2F&title=Ishrat%20Jahan%20encounter%3A%20Accused%20cop%20says%20Modi%20knew%20of%20conspiracy&ate=AT-ra-51824d0a602ef492/-/-/51cc429eaa60da28/2&frommenu=1&uid=51cc429e91338465&ct=1&pre=http%3A%2F%2Ftehelka.com%2Fishrat-jahan-encounter-accused-cop-says-modi-knew-of-conspiracy%2F&tt=0&captcha_provider=nucaptcha><http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300&winname=addthis&pub=ra-51824d0a602ef492&source=tbx32-300&lng=en-US&s=reddit&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftehelka.com%2Fishrat-jahan-encounter-accused-cop-says-modi-knew-of-conspiracy%2F&title=Ishrat%20Jahan%20encounter%3A%20Accused%20cop%20says%20Modi%20knew%20of%20conspiracy&ate=AT-ra-51824d0a602ef492/-/-/51cc429eaa60da28/3&frommenu=1&uid=51cc429e73e25ebd&ct=1&pre=http%3A%2F%2Ftehelka.com%2Fishrat-jahan-encounter-accused-cop-says-modi-knew-of-conspiracy%2F&tt=0&captcha_provider=nucaptcha><http://tehelka.com/ishrat-jahan-encounter-accused-cop-says-modi-knew-of-conspiracy/?singlepage=1#>

 Green signal The fake encounter was allegedly approved by both Narendra
Modi <http://tehelka.com/tag/narendra-modi/> and Amit
Shah<http://tehelka.com/tag/amit-shah/>,
*Photo:* Mayur Bhatt

The CBI <http://tehelka.com/tag/cbi/> is set to submit before a court next
week a testimony that claims Gujarat
<http://tehelka.com/tag/gujarat/>Chief Minister Narendra Modi was in
the know of a conspiracy by policemen
to kill four people, including a woman, in 2004 and falsely pass them off
as terrorists. The testimony is from a police officer who claims to have
overheard a conversation between two other officers, one from the
Intelligence Bureau (IB <http://tehelka.com/tag/ib/>) and the other from
the police, who were both said to be close to Modi at that time.

The CBI would submit this testimony with its chargesheet in the case on 4
July. The testifying officer is an accused in the pre-dawn killing of the
four people, including Ishrat Jahan <http://tehelka.com/tag/ishrat-jahan/>,
19. The killings were carried out on 15 June 2004 by men of the Crime
Branch of Ahmedabad, Gujarat’s largest city that adjoins state capital
Gandhinagar. Police said the alleged terrorists were headed to assassinate
Modi.

To be sure, the alleged conversation — between Rajendra
Kumar<http://tehelka.com/tag/rajendra-kumar/>of the IB, a Central
agency, and Crime Branch officer DG
Vanzara <http://tehelka.com/tag/dg-vanzara/> — did not mention Modi by
name. The testifying officer, who belongs to the IPS and whose identity
TEHELKA has decided to withhold to protect him from intimidation, claims
Vanzara told Kumar in his presence that the conspiracy to kill the four
people had been approved by both the “*safed daadhi* (grey beard)” and the “
*kali daadhi* (black beard)”.

The CBI believes that the former is a reference to Modi and the latter to
Amit Shah, Modi’s longtime confidant who was then the state’s junior home
minster in charge of the state police. Modi, as chief minister, had kept
the home portfolio with him then, as he still does. The CBI plans to tell
the court that in view of this officer’s testimony, it wants to probe
Modi’s role in the killing. The testimony was sworn before a magistrate
under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code and is admissible as
evidence. A CBI officer confirmed that Kumar would be named as an accused
in the chargesheet. (The CBI has 21 sworn testimonies in the case, 14 of
which are from IPS officers.)

The CBI chargesheet will also claim that the alleged leader of the four
people killed, Javed Ahmed Shaikh, had, in fact, worked as an informer for
Kumar, who at that time had headed the Gujarat unit of the IB. The CBI says
evidence suggests Kumar had asked Shaikh to come to Ahmedabad on the
pretext of carrying out an assignment for him and then organised Shaikh’s
killing along with that of the three others, including Jahan. On 18 June,
the CBI had questioned Kumar, currently a Special Director with the IB, at
Gandhinagar. It is learnt that the CBI might arrest him in a few days.
TEHELKA had last week reported that more than one police officer has in
sworn testimonies made before a magistrate claimed that Kumar had
masterminded the extrajudicial murders.

Also, TEHELKA reported
that<http://tehelka.com/amit-shah-rajendra-kumar-ordered-ishrat-jahan-encounter/>
GL
Singhal <http://tehelka.com/tag/gl-singhal/>, one of the accused police
officers, has given the CBI an audiotape he says he secretly recorded in
November 2011. It reportedly contains a conversation between Singhal and
several top guns of the Modi government. The CBI says the group discussed
ways to sabotage the investigation into the killings to save the officers
involved from prosecution. The tape is also part of the chargesheet.

TEHELKA has now learnt the identity of two others in that conversation who
it had not named last week. They are Pradeep Singh Jadeja, the minister for
legislative affairs, and Bhupinder Chudasama, the education minister.
Others in that conversation are Praful Patel, the then junior home minister
who left the government after losing in last December’s Assembly election;
GC Murmu, an IAS officer who is a confidant of Modi’s; and the government’s
topmost lawyer who appears in this case, Advocate General Kamal Trivedi.

The meeting was reportedly held the night before a Special Investigation
Team (SIT) set up on the orders of the Gujarat High Court was to submit its
findings. In the tape, Trivedi is heard telling the others: “If the SIT
tomorrow declares the Ishrat Jahan encounter fake, all of us will have to
collectively stand up and shout that the SIT is fake.” Murmu allegedly says
no harm should come to the state or its officers. The SIT report submitted
the next day said the police kidnapped the four people and killed them in
cold blood.

Modi’s government maintains that Shaikh, Jahan, who was a college student
from near Mumbai, and the other two men, both allegedly Pakistanis, were
terrorists. It claims that the police challenged them outside Ahmedabad and
killed them in an exchange of gunfire. The IB had provided the intelligence
input that a Pakistani terrorist outfit, Lashkar -e- Toiba, had sent the
four to avenge a massacre of about 2,000 Muslims in Gujarat in 2002 by
Hindu zealots linked to Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party
(BJP<http://tehelka.com/tag/bjp/>).
The CBI chargesheet will now accuse Kumar of fabricating that intelligence
input. TEHELKA had reported last week that the CBI also has testimonies
from officers alleging that Kumar visited Jahan while she was in illegal
police custody before she was killed, and that an AK-47 gun found on those
killed had been sourced from Kumar’s IB office and planted there.

The CBI chargesheet will also suggest that the other two men killed that
night — Zeeshan Jauhar and Amjad Ali Rana — were not Pakistanis but
possibly secessionist militants from Jammu & Kashmir with some connection
with terror groups. It says Kumar had earlier introduced the duo to Shaikh,
the informer, and “encouraged” him to stay in touch with them. Before the
killings, it was Kumar who had asked Shaikh to get the duo to travel to
Ahmedabad, which Shaikh had then organised, say CBI sources. The CBI will
be seeking an extension from the trial court for further probe on precisely
how the four were introduced to Kumar.

In fact, says the CBI, Kumar made the three men phone their alleged
counterparts in Pakistan and recorded those conversations. It was these
recordings that the English language television news channel, Headlines
Today, broadcast earlier this month to suggest they were terrorists heading
to kill Modi, say sources. These cell phones used to make the calls to
Pakistan were planted next to their bodies.

The CBI says Kumar scripted Shaikh’s travels in the days preceding his
arrival in Ahmedabad that led to his killing. It was Kumar who arranged for
Shaikh to travel to Uttar Pradesh capital Lucknow, to buy a locally-made
pistol. It was at Kumar’s behest that Shaikh travelled to Aurangabad city
in Maharashtra. In every hotel he stayed in, Shaikh used aliases as Kumar
had told him to do so, say CBI sources.

*CROSS-ENCOUNTER LINKS*

Both Vanzara and Shah, the former junior home minister, are also accused in
another alleged extrajudicial killing in 2005 of a married couple,
Sohrabuddin Sheikh and Kausar Bi, who, too, were branded as terrorists
killed in a shootout. Vanzara has been arrested in both the 2004 and the
2005 killings. Shah was arrested in 2010 in the Sohrabuddin-Kausar Bi
killings and bailed three months later. Two months ago, the BJP put Shah in
charge of the party in UP, India’s politically most influential state where
the BJP hopes to win big to return to power in New Delhi in next year’s
General Election.

But Shah faces bad news next week. The CBI is planning to summon him for
questioning in yet another case, that of the extrajudicial killing of Sadiq
Jamal, a 22-year-old Muslim youth the police killed in Ahmedabad in 2003.

The CBI says Shah had connected with Kumar, who figures prominently in
Jamal’s killing, on the day of the alleged encounter. Currently
investigating four cases in which the police are accused of killing people
in cold blood in Gujarat and labelling them terrorists, the CBI says
Kumar’s culpability is starkest in the shooting of Jamal. Last week,
TEHELKA reported that former and current IB officers from Maharashtra had
given sworn testimonies against him.

The CBI has interrogated two senior IB officers in the neighbouring state,
Datta Palsagikar and Gururaj Savagatti, who it believes falsified the
intelligence inputs about Jamal being a terrorist and became part of the
conspiracy to kill him. The CBI has also interrogated a suspended Mumbai
Police officer, Pradeep Sharma, who had once gained notoriety as an
“encounter specialist” for shooting dead over a hundred alleged criminals.
Jamal had been in Sharma’s custody before he was handed to Gujarat Police.
Sharma is serving a sentence in Mumbai for similarly faking an encounter
killing there.

A police officer that the CBI has already arrested in Gujarat in Jamal’s
killing is Tarun Barot, a DSP who allegedly took Jamal’s custody from
Mumbai. Barot is also an accused in the 2004 encounter killing. The CBI,
which has filed a first chargesheet in the Jamal killing, says it is
investigating the role of the IB in fabricating the intelligence input
about Jamal that the police cited in killing him.

The CBI’s interrogation of Kumar has been long in the waiting. For a year
the IB stonewalled the CBI’s attempts to question Kumar. But when lately
Kumar’s complicity became increasingly evident in both the killings of
Jamal and of Jahan, IB chief Asif Ibrahim, CBI director Ranjit Sinha and
Union Home Secretary RK Singh met over days to discuss ways to proceed. It
is learnt that Kumar arrived in Gandhinagar this month to meet the CBI
after his bosses told him they had been promised that he would not be
arrested. Satish Verma, a CBI officer on the case who the Gujarat
government has accused of being biased against it, refused to join the
interrogation in protest.

Though the CBI is armed with a slew of testimonies, they are relying more
than the others on Singhal, who promises to be a key witness. Once a star
policeman but now disgraced, Singhal is said to have decided to speak the
truth after his only child, his 17-year-old son, committed suicide this
year. “This is divine justice, sir,” he told CBI officers during a
conversation, breaking down. “I have been punished as I killed the
innocent.”

[email protected]


-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to