"(T)he agreements operationalising the nuclear deal with Areva come despite it being under scrutiny for using sub standard material in the European Pressurized Reactor being built at Flamanville (France)."
In case of Areva, at least, it is more an optical illusion. Here is an excerpt from a report carried by the ToI at <http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Jaitapur-nuclear-project-makes-headway/articleshow/46902037.cms>: ***The Nuclear Power Corporation and a French firm, Areva, signed what is known as a pre-engineering agreement*** [emphasis added] conforming to the "Make In India" campaign, according to an announcement by the department of atomic energy (DAE) on Sunday. ... ***The new agreement firmed up on April 10, 2015, chiefly relates to the assessment of licenseability, adhering to Indian laws and codes and general acceptability and understanding of the technology itself*** [emphasis added]. According to DAE, after a detailed safety assessment, the NPC will take up the licensing process with the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB). END That evidently does not amount to "agreements operationalising the nuclear deal with Areva." As regards the MMRCA deal: ""The fine print of what has been agreed (in the Modi-Hollande summit) is not with me yet," he said." A defence deal is concluded with a foreign country, and the Defence Minister confesses to the media, and no less, that he is not in the loop! That's truly extraordinary, of course, only if we overlook the basic fact that Modi is at the helm of affairs. Apart from that the decision to purchase outright 36 Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircrafts (MMRCA) without bothering about the provision for technology transfer to the state-owned HAL simply makes a mockery of the "Make in India' slogan. This is apart from the cost aspect. And, on top of that, we're told: "Holding that "nitty-gritties" are not worked out at the PM-level, he [i.e. the Defence Minister] said ***India and France would now hold discussions on the future course of action*** [emphasis added]" So all these talks about the "bold decision" and "outright purchase" are just a lot of hot air? (See: <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/india-unity/conversations/messages/55963>.) Sukla On 15/04/2015, Vivek Sundara. <[email protected]> wrote: > PM Modi Sacrifices 'Make in India' to Bail Out Two Near Bankrupt French > Companies, Dassault And Areva > The Citizen Bureau > <http://www.thecitizen.in/ByLine.aspx?Name=The%20Citizen%20Bureau> > The French boat ride! > > *NEW DELHI:* France got a Santa Claus in the form of Prime Minister > Narendra Modi who bailed out two major loss making companies in one visit. > Dassault Aviation got a new lease of life with PM Modi's order for 36 > 'ready to fly' Rafale fighter jets, and the French nuclear company Areva > tottering amidst major losses and controversy on basic nuclear security got > two major agreements to take the manufacture of the six EPR nuclear > reactors at Jaitapur forward. > > The Prime Minister's 'Make in India' has not done too well during his visit > to France. One, the direct purchase of the fighter jets does not carry a > whiff of indigenous production at the moment. And two, the agreements > operationalising the nuclear deal with Areva come despite it being under > scrutiny for using sub standard material in the European Pressurized > Reactor being built at Flamanville (France). > > PM Modi chose to ignore warnings by nuclear experts and others in India > against finalising the nuclear deal with Areva, just like his predecessor > Manmohan Singh who had initiated the Memorandum of Understanding between > Areva and the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL). A General > Framework Agreement for the construction of the first two EPR reactors was > signed in December 2010, despite warnings by nuclear experts in India > advising against business with the French company with an increasingly > dismal record. > > Areva on its website has now announced that in the presence of PM Modi and > French president Francois Hollande it has signed a "Pre-engineering > Agreement (PEA) contract with the Indian operator Nuclear Power Corporation > of India Limited (NPCIL) for the preparation of EPR licensibility in India > for the Jaitapur project. These studies will also enable both companies to > finalize the technical configuration of the project." And also, "AREVA and > Larsen & Toubro (L&T), India's largest engineering and construction > conglomerate, also signed a memorandum of understanding to explore avenues > of collaboration for the future Jaitapur project." > > This comes despite petitions and letters to the Prime Minister by nuclear > experts and others. Former secretary to the government of India EAS Sarma > wrote to the PM's Principal Secretary Nripendra Misra enclosing three > reports on Areva and pointing out the following: > > "Areva has run into losses of the order of US$5.6 billion during 2014. Its > work on Finland's Olkiluoto 3 nuclear reactors has caused significant time > and cost over-runs. The project completion schedule has been extended > several times, the latest being 2018, which implies more than 13 years for > the project. The cost of the Finland reactors has already gone up by a mind > boggling factor of 2.4. there is no guarantee that either the revised costs > or the rescheduled completion schedule are final. > > In the case of the reactor that Areva is constructing in Flamanville, > northern France, it has been reported that the company used flawed steel in > crucial parts in the reactor. This raises serious safety concerns. Reuters > reported just a week ago, > > "Areva declined to comment on whether the tests would lead to new delays > for Flamanville and impact three other EPRs under construction, one in > Olkiluoto, Finland, two in Taishan, China. > > "The ASN has informed nuclear regulators in other countries where EPRs are > being built," the regulator said. > > French Energy Minister Segolene Royal said in a statement that results of > the new tests are expected in October." > > As in the case of the US MNCs, the French reactor suppliers are apparently > not confident of the safety features of their reactors and are therefore > reluctant to assume responsibility for the liability arising from major > accidents attributable to reactor design deficiencies. It is possible that > France will also push India into owning liability in excess of the existing > token liability cap provided in the civil liability law by agreeing to > cover the same by issuing sovereign guarantees and asking the PSU insurance > companies to bear a portion of it. This would indirectly amount to going > beyond what the government had earlier assured the Parliament. > > Any dilution in the liability to be borne by the French companies will > incentivise them to compromise on safety. > > The well established "polluter pays" principle requires the reactor > suppliers to assume the liability in the event of an accident. The matter > is pending at present for adjudication by the apex court." > > Sarma reiterated the same concerns expressed by experts to former PM > Manmohan Singh about the dangers inherent in this project for the people > living in the vicinity. Singh ignored the warnings, with villagers coming > out in large numbers to protest against the reactors that are now perceived > as a major security hazard in and around Jaitapur in Maharashtra. PM Modi > too is clearly not impressed with the caution voiced by concerned experts > and has decided to follow Singh on the nuclear issue. Significantly, the > French nuclear safety regulator ASN is not underestimating the issue and > has reported serious defects in the European Pressurized Reactor being > built at Flamanville (France) by Areva. > > The Coalition for Nuclear Disarmament and Peace also petitioned the > government against moving forward with Areva saying, "the detected defects > have to do with substandard material used in crucial components, the bottom > and the lid of the EPR pressure vessel, the very heart of the reactor. > These components cannot be repaired once the reactor goes critical. > > The revelation vindicates long-standing safety concerns of independent > nuclear experts and citizens' groups especially in Finland and India where > Areva is constructing or planning to build EPRs. > > The EPR's design and construction have run into unending problems both in > France and Finland, where the first such reactor has been under > construction since 2005. Its completion has been delayed from 2009 at least > till 2018, and its costs have nearly tripled. > > France, once the nuclear industry's poster-boy, has itself decided to scale > down nuclear power generation by 25% and make an "energy transition" to > renewable sources." > > Areva has had a chequered history and has been incurring heavy losses. It > was set up in 2001 but has little to its credit except a history of > inordinate delays, and major financial losses. In 2014 Standard and Poor's > downgraded Areva long term debt making it even more difficult for it to > raise money on the financial market with reports suggesting that the French > government too is unwilling to increase the capital for this state owned > concern. > > Areva announced on March 4 a loss of 4.8 billion euros in 2014 fiscal year > and a decrease of 8% of its turnover. At a time when its business is being > badly hit with low credibility, the Indian decision to move ahead with the > MoU is a major credibility booster that Areva, like Dassault Aviation, > hopes to use to revive sagging financial fortunes. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Free Binayak Sen" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/free-binayaksen. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Peace Is Doable -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
