http://scroll.in/article/727170/why-secular-expression-is-being-killed-in-bangladesh-one-blogger-at-a-time

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
Why secular expression is being killed in Bangladesh, one blogger at a time
K. Anis Ahmed  · Yesterday · 09:30 pm

Islamic extremists have declared open season on bloggers and anyone
they deem to be atheists.

Yet another Bangladeshi blogger was hacked to death on Monday. This
young man, Ananta Bijoy, belonged to Mukto Mona, the online group of
the other recently slain blogger Avijit Roy.

At this point it seems Islamic extremists have declared open season on
bloggers and anyone they deem to be atheists. Lists of targets named
by militants have been around for some time now. That they are now
willing to act on them with brutal efficacy imperils not only
individuals, but also a relatively open culture, and certainly the
authority of the state and its laws.

A history of murder

The murder of Avijit Roy outside the famous Ekushey Book Fair, and the
attack on Oyasikur Rahman, within a month of each other, brought the
Islamist assault on Bangladesh's free-thinkers to the world's
attention.

But the first blogger hacked to death was Rajeeb Haider in February
2013. His killing came at the peak of the "Shahbagh Movement," which
had come about as a direct result of activism by secular bloggers. At
that time, the Bangladeshi International Crimes Tribunal had sentenced
Qader Molla, a leader of the Islamist political party Jamaat-e-Islami,
to life imprisonment as a convicted war criminal.

The movement was triggered by Molla brandishing a "V" sign in glee at
dodging the death penalty. The bloggers' online anger exploded into a
street protest that quickly swelled to the thousands.

Shahbagh, however, was not an unalloyed success. It was quickly
coopted by groups affiliated with the ruling Awami League. The
protesters themselves alienated many, both at home and abroad, with
their insistence on the death penalty as the only acceptable
punishment.

The Islamists, however, did not wait for the movement to wind down by
itself. Using social media, they responded with a vicious but canny
ploy to paint the bloggers as "atheists" campaigning against religion,
not secularists seeking long overdue justice.

Derailing war crimes trials

The Islamists have resorted to any means possible to try to derail the
war crimes trials. In late 2013, as BNP fought for a neutral
government to oversee elections, their key ally Jamaat, and especially
its notorious student wing Shibir, waged a campaign of violence
against civilians. What is clear is that, just as in 1971, Jamaat and
other Islamists have no qualms about using violence against ordinary
civilians to attain their political goals.

In the long and ongoing contest between an intolerant conception of
Islam and a rationalist idea of what it means to be Bengali Muslim,
the bloggers sadly are not the first victims. Sceptics, including
prominent literary figures like Daud Haider in the 1970s and Taslima
Nasreen in the 1990s, have faced strong Islamist backlash and have had
to leave the country for good.

Another strong secular voice, Humayun Azad, was in fact the first
intellectual to be hacked - and that too right outside the Ekushey
Book Fair - in 2003, though he died six months later in Germany.

Attacking the secular strain in Bengali Muslim culture

The recent killing of bloggers, then, should not be seen as a sudden
awakening of Islamists to free-thinking. A secular intellectual strain
has been part of Bengali Muslim culture going at least as far back as
the Buddhir Muktir Andolan of the 1920s. Additionaly, there have been
long periods of dormancy in this putative conflict.

Many openly sceptical thinkers, from Aruj Ali Matubbar to Ahmed
Sharif, passed their careers with no great threats. Many of
Bangladesh's leading literary lights have been sceptics too, if not
outright atheist, and vocal to different extents, including iconic
figures like Shamsur Rahman, Akhtaruzzaman Ilyas and yet others whom
it may no longer be safe to name.

Shamsur Rahman lived much of his life publicly revered, but survived a
knife attack in his last years. That attack, along with the assault on
Azad, marked the emergence of a more vicious new strain of Islamism.

But even these Islamists seemed aware of the broad cultural
disapproval of violence, and such attacks were never as frequent as
they have become lately. Until 2013, all mainstream parties too were
careful to minimise any civilian casualties.

The BNP-Jamaat movement of 2013 saw, for the first time, the
widespread targeting of civilians, crossing a toll of 500 by the end.
That kind of violent tactics was repeated by them again earlier this
year, taking a further toll of over 150 civilians.

Tolerance versus absolutism

Given Bangladesh's long tradition of relative tolerance, the killing
of bloggers should not be seen as an intensification only of Islamist
ambitions. It is tied to a broader history of struggle between those
who wish for a fundamentally tolerant society and those who believe in
an absolutist one. A mainstream party like BNP signalling violence
against civilians as a permissible tactic has surely loosened a sense
of constraint.

The current government faces a tough quandary. If it resorts to
tougher measures against Islamists, it may be painted by BNP-Jamaat as
anti-Islamic, and by its secular allies as autocratic. If the
government remains restrained in its response, then the Islamists may
feel emboldened.

The trick here might be to ignore the false dichotomy of tough or soft
actions,  and focus on being much more precise and energetic in
response to specific crimes. It also has to make incitement of
violence, be it in a Friday sermon or in a digital hole, more
punishable.

The Awami League so far has been bold in continuing with the war
crimes trials. But that commitment cannot be confined to measures that
put extremist leaders in jail, or send them to the gallows. It must
also extend to defending the principles of a secular and tolerant
Bangladesh by truly making it harder for anyone to kill - or even call
for the killing - of another citizen.

Bangladesh is one of the few Muslim nations that chose at birth to be
secular. But every time a progressive is felled, and the crime goes
without punishment, the voices of a hundred other progressives go
quieter. No nation can thrive in the long run if such voices fall
silent.

K. Anis Ahmed is a Bangladeshi author of two books - a novel and a
collection of short stories - and publisher of the English-language
daily newspaper Dhaka Tribune and the literary journal Bengal Lights.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to