[The question that arises now is — how is this frenzy of
toilet-building changing the situation on the ground? After nearly
one-and-a-half years, there should be some concrete evaluation. Sadly,
there is no comprehensive study. Ashok Kumar Jain, adviser in the NITI
Aayog and an expert on the programme, told TOI that a study will be
conducted in the coming days because the World Bank, which has given a
$1.5-billion loan for the programme, wants an evaluation.]

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Swachh-Bharat-Toilets-aplenty-but-no-water-to-use-them/articleshow/52496514.cms

Swachh Bharat: Toilets aplenty, but no water to use them

Subodh Varma | TNN | May 30, 2016, 03.52 AM IST

The central government has spent Rs 9,093 crore on building about 1.8
crore toilets across the country under the Swachh Bharat Mission since
October 2014. This is because Prime Minister Modi has made the drive a
priority. The mission also envisages a cleaner India at large,
although this part of the plan is hazy.

***The question that arises now is — how is this frenzy of
toilet-building changing the situation on the ground? After nearly
one-and-a-half years, there should be some concrete evaluation. Sadly,
there is no comprehensive study. Ashok Kumar Jain, adviser in the NITI
Aayog and an expert on the programme, told TOI that a study will be
conducted in the coming days because the World Bank, which has given a
$1.5-billion loan for the programme, wants an evaluation.*** [Emphasis
added.]

Meanwhile, the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) came out
with a 'Swachhata Status Report' earlier this year. Findings listed in
the report, especially those concerned with water use and drainage of
liquid waste, give a glimpse of how the programme is performing on the
ground.

According to the NSSO report, just 42.5% of rural households have
"water for use in toilets". This is a critical factor that can make or
break the most well-laid plans. And, this is not something new that
has been discovered recently. Decades of toilet-building have —
presumably — taught policymakers that without making arrangements for
water the toilets will be useless.

The second critical component for use of toilets is drainage. This is
often not of immediate concern to households but should be high up on
the policymakers' priority list. Because the whole point of having
toilets would be defeated if effluents from it are just spreading out
into fields or village ponds. And this is what appears to be happening
on a large scale.

The NSSO report says that a staggering 44.4% of villages have no
arrangement for the disposal of liquid waste. It doesn't spell out
further details as to what is happening to the toilets in these
villages. It would be safe to presume that residents don't use them.

What about the remaining 55.6% of the villages? Of these, 36.7% have
what the report quaintly records as a "pakki nali" while 19% have a
"katchi nali". These are drains, one lined with concrete or bricks,
the other just channels dug into the soil. And where are these "nalis"
leading to? The report says that about 16% drain into local ponds, 24%
into the local "nala", and about 7% into a local river.

The situation in urban areas is worse. Although 56.4% of households
are using toilets connected to the sewer network, most of the sewage
goes straight into the rivers.
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to