[The letter, which comes months before the Lok Sabha elections, includes as
signatories former national security adviser Shivshankar Menon, former
foreign secretary Nirupama Menon Rao, former secretary in the finance
ministry Narendra Sisodia, former IAS officer Aruna Roy.
...
However, the real issue today, the group of civil servants writes, “is not
about “EVMs versus paper ballots” — according to them, it is about “EVMs
with perfunctory VVPAT audit versus EVMs with proper VVPAT audit”.
In order to ensure that voting is free of possible EVM malfunction and
manipulation, the group says, the EC  must overcome a “series of serious
shortcomings” in their VVPAT audit implementation.
...
The group writes that while large-scale EVM manipulation is highly
improbable, “probability can increase significantly with insider
collusion”.
...
The group suggests that the EC adopt “a statistically correct sample size
that can detect at least one defective EVM with 99.9 per cent reliability”.
Further, the retired civil servants also appeal that the EC create a
framework for situations that demand full manual counting of VVPAT slips,
including the results of closely-contested constituencies where the margin
of victory is below 2 per cent of the votes cast or 1,000 votes, whichever
is less, even if no defective EVM turns up in the sample.
“Though the counting process may take a little longer, the confidence of
the voters and political parties in the electoral process will be
reinforced,” the group writes.>>

https://theprint.in/governance/73-former-civil-servants-give-ec-a-solution-to-evm-row-and-its-not-paper-ballot/197303/

73 former IAS, IPS & IFS officers give EC a solution to EVM row, and it’s
not paper ballot
The letter, which comes months before the Lok Sabha elections, includes as
signatories former NSA Shivshankar Menon & former foreign secretary
Nirupama Menon Rao.

NANDITA SINGH

Updated: 24 February, 2019 6:46 pm IST

Electronic voting machine | Getty Images
File image of Electronic Voting Machine | Getty Images

New Delhi: A group of 73 former civil servants, including Indian
Administrative Service (IAS), Indian Police Service (IPS), and Indian
Foreign Service (IFS) officers, waded into the political row over
electronic voting machines (EVMs) Sunday, writing an open letter to point
out “serious shortcomings” in the implementation of the verifiable voter
paper audit trail (VVPAT)-based audit of EVMs.

The letter, which comes months before the Lok Sabha elections, includes as
signatories former national security adviser Shivshankar Menon, former
foreign secretary Nirupama Menon Rao, former secretary in the finance
ministry Narendra Sisodia, former IAS officer Aruna Roy.

According to the former civil servants, a parallel VVPAT tally of EVM
results is essential to ensure free and fair elections, because “it is
common knowledge that EVMs are ‘black boxes’ in which it is impossible for
voters to verify whether their votes have been recorded and counted
correctly”.

VVPAT is a physical record of every vote cast in an election.

The efficiency of EVMs becomes a hot topic of debate every election season,
with the losing side often blaming “manipulated EVMS” for its defeat. In
fact, the Congress moved the Election Commission (EC) last year to seek a
return to paper ballots amid a “serious question mark on the credibility,
independence and fairness of EVMs”.

Also read: EC unlikely to yield to opposition demand to verify 50% of EVM
results with paper trails

However, the real issue today, the group of civil servants writes, “is not
about “EVMs versus paper ballots” — according to them, it is about “EVMs
with perfunctory VVPAT audit versus EVMs with proper VVPAT audit”.

In order to ensure that voting is free of possible EVM malfunction and
manipulation, the group says, the EC  must overcome a “series of serious
shortcomings” in their VVPAT audit implementation.

The ‘short-comings’
First, the group says that the EC’s policy of using just “one polling
station (i.e. 1 EVM) per assembly constituency” is a statistically
incorrect sample size, because the number of EVMs in a constituency varies
widely across states “from about 20 to about 300” and within the state
itself.

For example, the group explains, Sikkim has 589 EVMs, Chhattisgarh has
23,672, and Uttar Pradesh, nearly 1,50,000.

Second, the retired bureaucrats point out, the EC has not made public “as
to how it arrived at its sample size nor has it specified the population to
which this sample size relates”. Sample sizes based on wide differences in
population, they add, lead to “high margins of error” which “are
unacceptable in a democracy”.

The EC has also “been vague about its ‘decision rule’ in the event of one
or more defective EVMs turning up in the chosen sample”, and “failed to be
transparent about the results of its VVPAT-based audit of EVMs for the
various assembly elections held in 2017 and 2018”.

“The details are not available on its website,” the group writes.

“The lack of transparency in VVPAT-based audit of EVMs has fuelled various
conspiracy theories about ‘mass rigging of EVMs,” the group writes.

Also read: India should put the EVM hacking debate to rest and here’s how

Most recently, the Europe chapter of the Indian Journalists’ Association
(IJA) set up a live demonstration in London where a “US-based cyber expert”
named Syed Shuja was to demonstrate how EVMs could be hacked.

Yet, Shuja, who claimed that every Indian election since 2014 had been
rigged, failed to deliver what he had set out to show — a demonstration of
how EVMs could be tampered with.

The way forward
The group writes that while large-scale EVM manipulation is highly
improbable, “probability can increase significantly with insider
collusion”.

For example, “potential attackers need to target only select EVMs to tip
the balance in a few marginal, closely fought constituencies”, the group
explains.

The group suggests that the EC adopt “a statistically correct sample size
that can detect at least one defective EVM with 99.9 per cent reliability”.

Further, the retired civil servants also appeal that the EC create a
framework for situations that demand full manual counting of VVPAT slips,
including the results of closely-contested constituencies where the margin
of victory is below 2 per cent of the votes cast or 1,000 votes, whichever
is less, even if no defective EVM turns up in the sample

“Though the counting process may take a little longer, the confidence of
the voters and political parties in the electoral process will be
reinforced,” the group writes.
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to