It's probably more user-friendly than some of the other solutions being
tried here and there!
--RC
On 05/11/2013 10:17 PM, Luís Henrique Camargo Quiroz wrote:
   I vote for the wiki too.
  Â
2013/5/11 Brother Gabriel-Marie <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
So, where do we stand?
 I'm not sure how many users there are on this list, nor how long
it would take them to cast a vote for a wiki, but I for one, am
ready to get started.
-Brother Gabriel-Marie
On 5/11/2013 4:11 AM, Pierre Couderc wrote:
Le 11/05/2013 09:56, Pierre François a écrit :
On 05/11/2013 05:56 AM, Pierre Couderc wrote:
It is necessary anyway, one way or another, Â to have
2 servers, one
active and a second one inactive but regularly updated
with data of
the 1rst one, to be able to switch in case of bad
problem...
At my company, we do that with a good raid system and
full redundancy
of hardware.
I must admit that I don't have that kind of redundancy at
gabc.romanliturgy.org <http://gabc.romanliturgy.org>, but
my server can be one of the two servers
Pierre is speaking about.
Father Pierre François
Yes, it was my idea...
_______________________________________________
Gregorio-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
