I'll forward this since I did not reply all, for what it's worth. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Conor Cook <[email protected]> Date: Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:18 PM Subject: Re: [Gregorio-users] New shapes To: Abbazia Mater Ecclesiae <[email protected]>
I must say that I appreciate the proposed shapes, in their relation to the Solesmes score, but I have not yet had reason to make use of those neumes personally. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Abbazia Mater Ecclesiae < [email protected]> wrote: > 2015-06-09 17:03 GMT+02:00 Élie Roux <[email protected]>: > >> Le 09/06/2015 16:59, Br. Samuel Springuel a écrit : >> > Why not just make them available as alternate glyphs? Isn't that what >> > the new system is supposed to be for? >> >> That's a possibility yes, but these new shapes could be improved or >> commented before being merged. >> >> > Exactly, what I need is a feedback about new glyphs, and some suggestions. > My opinion is that actual shapes are not so clearly readable, mostly in > small scores, what I want to get is somehow a midway between Solesmes' > shapes (I don't really like the oriscus liq.) and current greciliae shapes, > that are too similar to "normal" puncti (oriscus and punctum liq. auct.) or > too similar to normal oriscus (oriscus liq.). > > If you have some suggestions, they're welcome. > > Thank you! > > Sr. M. Ruth > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gregorio-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users > >
_______________________________________________ Gregorio-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
