Dear Michael,
> However, I'm not sure if it is a good way to call a low-level
> (implementation level) command (\Vbar) from within the high-level
> gabc code. Is there a better way to achieve the same purpose and at
> the same time keep the gabc and gtex decoupled?
I'm affraid there's no better way to do this now...
> 2) Regarding the extended ledger line - Below is part of the
> modified gabc code: um.([ull:0{1]ddc/da..[ull:}], ......
>
> It seems to work except that the extended ledger line is broken
> under the note c, as if the note was too "thick" to leave space for
> the extra ledger line (see the picture attached). Is it something
> unexpected at? What can I do to fix it?
Can you provide us with a minimal example showing the bug (a .tex file
including a gabc snippet)? This will help quite a lot
Thank you,
--
Elie
_______________________________________________
Gregorio-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
