Dear all, At Julia site (http://julialang.org/) they placed the results  of a 
battery of small performance tests. The test scripts are referenced in the 
citation below: 
" we’ve written a small set of micro-benchmarks in a variety of  languages:  C 
,  Fortran ,  Julia ,  Python ,  Matlab/Octave ,  R ,  JavaScript ,  Java ,  
Lua ,  Go , and  Mathematica . 
" I began to translate R code into gretl to do the same battery of tests for 
Gretl. The script attached. The firs test is about recursion: compute Fibonacci 
numbers. Either, I wrote very inefficient code, or recursion in Gretl is very 
slow and needs amending. The attachment also contains non-recursive script for 
Fibonacci numbers. It works several thousands  times faster ( 172092 times on 
my pc) . Oleh 

Dear all,
At Julia site (http://julialang.org/) they placed the results 
of a battery of small performance tests. The test scripts
are referenced in the citation below:

"
we’ve written a small set of micro-benchmarks in a variety of
 languages:  C Fortran Julia Python Matlab/Octave R _javascript_ Java Lua Go , and  Mathematica .
"
I began to translate R code into gretl to do the same battery
of tests for Gretl. The script attached.
The firs test is about recursion: compute
Fibonacci numbers.
Either, I wrote very inefficient code, or
recursion in Gretl is very slow and needs amending.
The attachment also contains non-recursive script
for Fibonacci numbers. It works several thousands
 times faster ( 172092 times on my pc) .
Oleh


Attachment: timetests.inp
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to