Am 02.03.2021 15:11 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
Am 26.02.2021 um 10:51 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
Am 19.02.2021 um 13:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
I can't think of an easier way of doing this, and your function seems
to
me a good candidate for "extra". One possible modification would be:
function matrix unstack(series x, series names[null], \
strings S[null])
where the caller needs to supply one of @names or @S, allowing for
the
possibility that there's no handy series holding group names and you
therefore want to submit an array of group names directly. Or, drop
the
@S argument but be ready to construct automatic names (e.g. "unit%d")
in
case @names is not given.
Jack, would you take care of pushing this into 'extra', or is further
discussion needed?
Please, what's the status here?
Hi,
I asked Jack to think about the possibility to make this a (I think)
natural extension of my user-contributed "stack_data" package. But no
reply, yet ;-)
Artur
_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it
To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-le...@gretlml.univpm.it
Website:
https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/
