On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Allin Cottrell wrote: > >> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011, Allin Cottrell wrote: >> >>> Most of the time gretl CVS (and snapshots) are basically "latest >>> stable", but every now and then CVS gets a little wild as new >>> stuff comes in. Well, now is one of those times. [...] >> >> Well, it seems we're back to reasonable stability. Jack Lucchetti >> and I have run hundreds of accumulated scripts and have found >> nothing amiss in current CVS, despite big internal changes. > > Another important thing: if any of you out there is using home-written C > programs which link to libgretl, there are very high chances that your > program will not work anymore with the version of libgretl which is now in > CVS.
Thanks, Jack, I should have mentioned that. In the next release we'll change the major number of the gretl library to reflect the API/ABI change, and will update the API documentation on sourceforge. In the meantime, third-party users of libgretl will want to stick to the 1.9.5 source release, or CVS prior to 2011-07-11. Sorry if this causes inconvenience, but the new gretl API will be nicer to use. Allin Cottrell
