Ok, can you please tell me why? I see the same result without the time trend as regressor.
Thanks S. On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Simari wrote: > > > Importing data (set on 1,2,3 instead of 13/06/2011, > > 14/06/2011 etc. on file Excel) importing them as cross > > section instead of series and then not adding the time trend > > I have the same result. > > You need to add the time trend and use it as a regressor. > The Excel dates are OK but they are not a "variable", they're > just an index of the observations. > > Allin Cottrell > _______________________________________________ > Gretl-users mailing list > Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu > http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users >Ok,
can you please tell me why?
I see the same result without the time trend as regressor.
Thanks
S.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Allin Cottrell <cottr...@wfu.edu> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Simari wrote:
> Importing data (set on 1,2,3 instead of 13/06/2011,You need to add the time trend and use it as a regressor.
> 14/06/2011 etc. on file Excel) importing them as cross
> section instead of series and then not adding the time trend
> I have the same result.
The Excel dates are OK but they are not a "variable", they're
just an index of the observations.
Allin Cottrell
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
gretl-us...@lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users