* T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20060805 17:15]: > On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:02:36 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > Well, grml-x currently does not use "get-edid | parse-edid" but uses just > > hwinfo and the mechanisms of X-server itself. > > The main problem is: who can you trust? To give you an example how > > unreliable all the X-server stuff is take a look at my box: > > # get-edid | parse-edid > > [...] > > The EDID data should not be trusted as the VBE call failed Error: output > > block unchanged > > parse-edid: IO error reading EDID > May I suggest that if "get-edid | parse-edid" can return valid results, > use it as the first choice? I just run it and found that it is much > meaningful them my current xorg.conf result, which uses screen[0] and > device[0]. Yes, I will consider 'get-edid | parse-edid' for inclusion in the rewrite of grml-x. > FYI, what is automatically detected from my system: [...] Thanks. regards, -mika- -- http://grml.org/ # Linux for texttool-users and sysadmins http://wiki.grml.org/ # share your knowledge http://grml.supersized.org/ # the grml development weblog #grml @ irc.freenode.org # meet us on irc
pgpGHKzbu0jdZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Grml mailing list - Grml@mur.at http://lists.mur.at/mailman/listinfo/grml join #grml on irc.freenode.org grml-devel-blog: http://grml.supersized.org/
