On 10/18/05, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > I knew making SGR the default would bite back with a vengeance [snip] > > I still think it was the right choice inspite of all warnings. On the > other hand, most documentation systems seem to prefer HTML today > (which isn't my personal favourite), so it doesn't matter much...
Presently I think that SGR as the default wasn't a bad idea after all. And I agree with you. HTML is not my favorite either. Hmm.... I wonder if instead of talking about a graphical WYSIWYWYWG (what-you-see-is-what-you wish-you-would-get) tool, wouldn't be better to promote the use of troff (or some of the macro packages) as an output target for XML transform tools such as Open Jade and OpenSP... -- Alejandro López-Valencia _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
