> Would it be difficult to add a --without-texinfo configure option,
> or even check for the right version of texinfo during the configure
> phase? To me, that seems to be the best of both worlds; build the
> PDF when you can, and skip it (without aborting make) when you
> can't.
I don't see a reason to do this. groff.pdf isn't built automatically,
you have to explicitly say
make groff.pdf
within the `doc' directory.
Am I missing something? For building the info files you need the
`texinfo' package but no TeX, and this is a developer's prerequisite I
won't drop.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
