Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > - make glyphuni.cpp consistent with devhtml and devutf8. groff
> > currently already converts "\-" to U+2212 in the output; this
> > change to glyphuni.cpp doesn't change the behaviour, unless
> > composed characters will be used.
> >
> > -//{ "\\-", "2212" },
> > + { "\\-", "2212" },
>
> This change doesn't make sense. It's not possible to use a backslash
> within \[...]. Consequently, glyph names which start with a backslash
> can't be used as composites.
The patch part 14 uses the glyph_name_to_unicode() function at a different
place, namely for any glyphs, not only composed ones. Patch part 13 was
meant as a preparation for part 14.
> Instead of \- simply use glyph `mi'
> which is an alias defined for all devices.
But when the input file contains \- and not \(mi
and the output device is devutf8 or devhtml, the \- must somehow be
mapped to Unicode. If you don't want to do it in glyphuni.cpp, then you
need to do it in devutf8/R.proto and devhtml/R.proto. My patch attempted
to unify this as most as possible.
Bruno
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
