> I couldn't agree more. In many decades of programming engineering
> things I never lost sleep about IEEE compliance. [...]
Friends,
I don't object to adding math functions to groff. Since it won't be
used for typesetting I see no harm. Anyway, there are some obstacles:
. I can't use the patch I've sent to the list recently because it
isn't possible for me inspite of repeated tries to come in contact
with Abramo for a copyright disclaimer. As an official GNU
project I have to insist on such nasty details.
. Without that the code has to be written from scratch, and I don't
have time to do that -- BTW, my laptop has died, so don't expect
any coding within the next, say, 10 days.
So instead of complaining, please submit patches!
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
