> But if AGL 2.0 is sacred
More or less, yes :-)
> and the correction is an evil (but necessary) hack - it is logical
> to change textmap, with additional benefit of double entries in
> groff font description (for both u2206 and u0394).
OK, let's go this route. May I ask you to provide a patch for
groff_char.man (and/or grops.man) also which documents this? Or maybe
you find a better place for documentation.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
