Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ??? Things like \[rs] will definitely fail in classical troff
> implementations. So what do you mean with `traditional mode'?
I should have said I'm testing to be sure that they work in the
default mode, rather than needing compatibility mode to be forced off.
> What accuracy problems in groff_diff have you encountered?
Still investigating. I may be wrong, or I may be misunderstanding
what's there. I'll report back in detail when my conclusions are
firmer. But I think that some escapes that are only documented to
work in compatibility mode also work in groff native mode.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
