On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:51:12PM -0400, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> Subject: Re: [Groff] Underlining in groff
>
> ... I don't suppose
> there's any chance of underlining for the PostScript device being
> implemented in groff itself, is there? Sure would make things a lot
> easier.
I second the motion If so implemented, it would probably also
allow accurate strike-through (maybe?). It's not that I want
these for typographical reasons: these two forms are useful in
manuscript markup to show copy-editing changes or suggestions.
-- Steve
--
Steve Izma
-
Home: 35 Locust St., Kitchener N2H 1W6 p:519-745-1313 FAX:519-579-9872
Work: Wilfrid Laurier University Press p:519-884-0710 ext. 6125
E-mail: si...@golden.net or st...@press.wlu.ca
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style>
