Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote: > >> "The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to > >> ‘.end’." > >> > Any improvement in the wording is highly welcomed.
It's quite not easy for me, but let's try this:
"If a second argument is given to de (for exemple .de name end),
the two dots must (can?) be replaced by this argument (.end in
our example)."
Or this:
"The optional second argument to de define a replacement (substitution?)
for the two dots."
Pierre-Jean.
