Hi Denis, > Here is another idea. Use the existing (;) notation eg as follows > > (Ex; expr ) > > Where x is the existing unit indicator, E indicates an extended > expression and expr differs from current expressions in having > (a) operator priority; > (b) new string, matching and regular expression operators (Posix > conformant).
Good idea AFAICS. Werner, have you considered enhancing expression syntax in the past? If so, what were you ideas for fitting it into the existing syntax? Cheers, Ralph.
