Hi Branden, > I had first _heard_ of it some years ago, but the most significant bit > of prominent evangelism for it I'm aware of is from Ben Klemens's > _21st Century C_: > https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/14514281-21st-century-c
Interesting, thanks. The second edition gets a better star rating on Amazon: https://amzn.to/2rop9YN I'll add it to my pile of reading for which the web has ruined my attention span. Some reviewers think it florid and the opposite of terse, though. > [storage_class] {type_name [type_qualifier ...]} ... > > A storage class is only meaningful for a fundamental type so it makes > sense for it to go out front. +1. > > l = [42, 314]; m = l > > Are you saying they expect l to be defined as a 42x314 array, or that > they expect m to be a copy of l instead of a reference to l? They expect `m' to refer to a copy of the list referenced by `l', rather than both referring to the same list. -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
