Hi Dave, On Wed, Dec 05 2018 at 09:11:45 AM, Dave Kemper <saint.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since a new rc will have to be built anyway, Yes, unfortunately the "Final RC" in my mail subject was too optimistic.
> any chance this patch could be included? It's not critical by any > means, but it's very low-risk (correcting only documentation) and > fixes a factual error that makes following the logic of the example > confusing until you go look up what the nl register actually does > hold. > > If you want to stick with including only critical fixes at this stage, > no problem, I'll just roll this up with my other, more trivial > documentation corrections and submit a bug report when that hits some > kind of critical mass. As this patch it not dangerous and not controversial I've commited it on master. Thanks for reporting it. Regards, Bertrand
