I am off-topic. Ingo Schwarze wrote in <20200625214812.gf90...@athene.usta.de>: |given that two authoritative manual pages for the mdoc language |exist that describe exactly the same language, but in a somewhat ... | The manual page groff_mdoc(7): https://man.voidlinux.org/groff_mdoc | contained in the "groff" package documents exactly the same language | in a somehwat different style.
Oh my god. ... |+.Pp |+The manual page |+.Lk https://man.openbsd.org/mdoc.7 "mdoc(7)" |+contained in the |+.Dq mandoc |+package documents exactly the same language in a somehwat different style. Oh my god, II. somewhat is a typo here, Ingo. My humble opinion, luckily out-of-project. The day the existence of the additional mandoc page starts documenting a different language is the day that would have become a problem. Why only voidlinux? What about all other humans of all sex and colour who are main and everywhere not master and slave and upstream / downstream? That is sheer anarchy! I think mdoc(7) is a roff macro package, with the potential to use all roff commands, and therefore it belongs into roff software. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
