> > .SH id=foo class=bar > Your title here
Another problem my earlier idea <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2020-09/msg00031.html> would solve: .SH Your title here \!x X meta: set id foo \!x X meta: set class bar Or, given that \! is subject to diversions, something like: .SH Your title here\ \X'meta: set id foo'\ \X'meta: set class bar' Sorry I keep mentioning a solution that doesn't exist yet, I'm just amazed how well it meshes with everyday use, yet manages to solve our current difficulties… On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 08:56, Keith Marshall <keith.d.marsh...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > On 29/09/2020 16:27, James K. Lowden wrote: > > That would work, but IMO wouldn't be very convenient. I was thinking > > along the lines of > > > > .SH id=foo class=bar > > Your title here > > That would conflict with groff's existing SH usage; from groff_ms(7): > > .SH [xx] > > Unnumbered subheading. The use of the optional xx argument is > > a GNU extension, which adjusts the point size of the unnumbered > > subheading to match that of a numbered heading, introduced > > using .NH xx with the same value of xx. > > -- > Regards, > Keith. > >
