Hi, Steffen. Coming back to an old item of business. At 2020-09-29T19:12:00+1000, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > At 2020-09-28T22:57:37+0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > > Rereading the first messages of the thread ... i reiterated one of > > Ingo's statements in fact. > > Yes, I think the earlier discussions were pretty comprehensive. > > I haven't brought CS and CT support to groff_mdoc yet but I haven't > forgotten. Savannah #59106 is nagging me like a toothache.
I fixed #59106 but more bugs lurk with various combinations of cR and the C register. However, they don't seem to be regressions but rather to be of rather long tooth, and given a paucity of evidence of other users finding and complain about them, I think they can wait for the post-groff-1.23.0 era. CS and CT are now supported in mdoc, as of 9fa2aed4facae1c94cc339b891aca25c57074551, which I've just pushed. I've also tightened the synchrony between groff man(7) and mdoc(7) regarding registers and strings used for rendering parameters. They haven't diverged to date, and with this work it's less likely that they will in the future. Regards, Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature