At 2022-08-13T16:26:43-0400, James K. Lowden wrote: > Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> wrote: > > The reason is not that mandoc tbl(7) to HTML conversion is bad but > > that a structure display *is not tabular data*. > > Ingo's point is irrefutable.
Oh yeah? Prove it! ;-) > The goal of better output for structure definitions is salubrious. > What is considered problematic currently, and what is Alejandro's goal, > in terms of output? > > I've seen a lot of discussion about using tbl(1) to that end, but I > don't recall a "white paper" laying out the problem statement and > rationale for that particular solution. The discussion started on the linux-man list in the course of a patch review. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/62c1b6748d2faa6263264b9fcaa064495357441b.1658195739.git.nabijaczlew...@nabijaczleweli.xyz/T/#m83835d556f7dd115590ff756305734ce5fb27a18 I presented multiple alternatives. Regards, Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
