Follow-up Comment #2, bug #64575 (project groff): [comment #1 comment #1:] > I must have mistakenly thought that `PY` would call _mm_'s > `PF`, but experimentation reveals that this is not the case.
I hadn't even considered the possibility--and if I had, probably would have left pic.tmac as-is rather than testing the various permutations, for fear of missing some edge case. So you're three steps ahead of me again. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64575> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/