Thank You Prof. Shirts for your clarification.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Michael Shirts <mrshi...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's two issues here; an actual bug (#1315) with intramolecular 1-4 > interactions when combining function type 2 and 1, and the fact that > couple-intramol doesn't do exactly what you might expect it to do, > i.e.: right now, if one sets coupl-intramol = yes, LJ and Coul 1-4's > are left on (uncoupled) at all lambda. The actual bug is fixed in 5.0 > (actually, in 4.6.4). > > If you look in the discussion, then adding more flexibility is on the > short term plan. It is not in the beta current, but there is a good > chance this extra flexibility will be in the next test release and in > the final 5.0. If not, it will definitely be in 5.1. > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:11 AM, bipin singh <bipinel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please let me know whether the below issue (link) has been addressed in > this > > release: > > > > http://bugzilla.gromacs.org/issues/1340 > > > > If no then is there any plan to include this in future release. > > > > -- > > -------------------- > > Thanks and Regards, > > Bipin Singh > > > -- *--------------------Thanks and Regards,Bipin Singh* -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
