Hi All, In many papers, the authors cite the main gromacs paper and simply declare in the methods section that they used the gromacs analysis suite. Is that a good practice or should each tool be cited separately?
Eg: g_sas says: ++++ PLEASE READ AND CITE THE FOLLOWING REFERENCE ++++ Frank Eisenhaber and Philip Lijnzaad and Patrick Argos and Chris Sander and Michael Scharf The Double Cube Lattice Method: Efficient Approaches to Numerical Integration of Surface Area and Volume and to Dot Surface Contouring of Molecular Assemblies J. Comp. Chem. 16 (1995) pp. 273-284 -------- -------- --- Thank You --- -------- -------- -- Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar) Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13), Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
