On 8/19/14, 8:39 AM, Mahboobe Sadr wrote:

00.  genrestr -f KALP_newbox_editconf.gro -o strong_posre.itp -fc 100000 100000
100000

01.  perl inflategro.pl system.gro 4 DPPC 14 system_inflated.gro 5 area.dat

02.  grompp -f minim.mdp -c system_inflated.gro -p topol.top -o confout.tpr

03.  mdrun -v -deffnm confout

04.  perl inflategro.pl confout.gro 0.95 DPPC 0 system_shrink1.gro 5
area_shrink1.dat

05.  grompp -f minim.mdp -c system_shrink1.gro  -p topol.top -o em_shrink1.tpr

06.  mdrun -v -deffnm em_shrink1

07.  perl inflategro.pl em_shrink1.gro 0.95 DPPC 0 system_shrink2.gro 5
area_shrink2.dat

08.  grompp -f minim.mdp -c system_shrink2.gro -p topol.top -o em_shrink2.tpr

09.  mdrun -v -deffnm em_shrink2

10.  perl inflategro.pl em_shrink2.gro 0.95 DPPC 0 system_shrink3.gro 5
area_shrink3.dat

11.  grompp -f minim.mdp -c system_shrink3.gro -p topol.top -o em_shrink3.tpr

12.  mdrun -v -deffnm em_shrink3

13.  perl inflategro.pl em_shrink3.gro 0.95 DPPC 0 system_shrink4.gro 5
area_shrink4.dat

           part of result :

           Area per protein: 2 nm^2
           Area per lipid: 6.93639237588421 nm^2

           Area per protein, upper half: 1.75 nm^2
           Area per lipid, upper leaflet :      6.94036062985246 nm^2

           Area per protein, lower half: 2 nm^2
           Area per lipid, lower leaflet : 6.93639237588421 nm^2


6.9 nm^2 is not equal to 69 A^2.  It is 690 A^2.

-Justin

14.  grompp -f minim.mdp -c system_shrink4.gro -p topol.top -o em_shrink4.tpr

15.  mdrun -v -deffnm em_shrink4

--
Sent from myMail app for Android

Monday, 18 August 2014, 09:15PM +0430 from Justin Lemkul <[email protected]>:

On 8/18/14, 10:06 AM, Mahboobe Sadr wrote:
 >
 > Dear all,
 > I am new in gromacs and specially in MD simulation of membrane protein,
in   part "define box and solvent" of justin's tutorial , in scaling down the
lipids,  I reached an area per lipid of ~69 A^2, after 4 times instead of 26
times....
 > I don't know ,where I made a mistake?

Without seeing your exact commands and the corresponding output, there's nothing
to say.  If you scale each time by 0.95, it is mathematically impossible to
arrive at a proper APL in this system with only 4 iterations.  At least one of
your commands or preparation steps was wrong; the outcome is extremely 
reproducible.

-Justin

--
==================================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

[email protected] | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==================================================


--
==================================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

[email protected] | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==================================================
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to [email protected].

Reply via email to