Thanks for being so clear Mark.

Best,
Albert

On 05/11/2015 03:18 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
Hi,

Stuff was probably broken here before 4.6. I would trust only single
threaded in 4.6 and later, and only after comparing with 4.5.

Mark

On Mon, 11 May 2015 14:50 Albert Solernou <a.soler...@leeds.ac.uk> wrote:

Hi All,
I am thinking of running an implicit solvent simulation using Gromacs
(.mdp file pasted at the end of the email). However, I am a bit
concerned about its accuracy as I get different results for the
Polarisation term. More specifically, the first step of an energy
minimisation gives different values for this energy term depending on
the number of threads/processes that I use (while the rest of the E.
terms are exactly the same). I tried the Intel compilers + MKL, and the
GNU compilers + ACML, as well as GMX versions 5.0.4 and 5.1-beta1. I
could even get a segfault with the GNU compilers and ACML when using 2
"processes" (gmx mdrun -nt 2).

The question is simple. Am I doing anything wrong? Is there any
precaution that I should take?

Cheers,
Albert

-----------------------------------------------
; minim.mdp - used as input into grompp to generate em.tpr
integrator    = steep        ; Algorithm (steep = steepest descent
minimization)
emtol        = 1000.0      ; Stop minimization when the maximum force <
1000.0 kJ/mol/nm
emstep      = 0.01      ; Energy step size
nsteps        = 50000          ; Maximum number of (minimization) steps
to perform

; Parameters describing how to find the neighbors of each atom and how
to calculate the interactions
nstlist            = 1            ; Frequency to update the neighbor
list and long range forces
cutoff-scheme   = Group
ns_type            = grid        ; Method to determine neighbor list
(simple, grid)
coulombtype        = Cut-Off        ; Treatment of long range
electrostatic interactions
rcoulomb        = 999.0        ; Calculate all long range interactions
rvdw            = 1.2        ; Short-range Van der Waals cut-off
pbc            = no         ; Periodic Boundary Conditions (yes/no)

; Implicit solvent parameters:
implicit-solvent     =  GBSA           ; use implicit solvent
gb-algorithm         =  OBC           ; use the OBC approach for the GB
radius
gb-obc-alpha         =  1           ; parameters correspond to OBC-II
gb-obc-beta          =  0.8           ;
gb-obc-gamma         =  4.85           ;
gb-epsilon-solvent   =  78.5           ; as seen in the original paper.
sa-algorithm         =  Ace-approximation  ; include surface area
contribution for non-polar atoms
sa-surface-tension   =  0.0054           ; default value.

--
---------------------------------
    Dr Albert Solernou
    EPSRC Research Fellow,
    Department of Physics and Astronomy,
    University of Leeds
    Tel: +44 (0)1133 431451

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


--
---------------------------------
  Dr Albert Solernou
  EPSRC Research Fellow,
  Department of Physics and Astronomy,
  University of Leeds
  Tel: +44 (0)1133 431451

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Reply via email to