On 10/7/15 3:01 PM, Dries Van Rompaey wrote:
Hi Mark,

This is Gromacs 5.0.4. This is a non-terminal residue.
The command line used is:
gmx pdb2gmx -f complex.pdb -o complex.gro (-ignh)
I tried this procedure with and without ignh flag.
As far as I know, specbonds is not in play.


Non-terminal proline does not have an amide H. If your force field .rtp file claims to use such an atom used in a dihedral (which is what the error message tells you is happening), find out who altered the file and reprimand them :)

-Justin

Kind regards,
Dries


On 7 October 2015 at 20:56, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abra...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

Is it terminal? Are there specbonds in play? What's the GROMACS version?
What's your pdb2gmx command line? :-)

Mark

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 PM Dries Van Rompaey <
dries.vanromp...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Hi everyone,

I'm getting the following warning when I try to run pdb2gmx on my protein
structure:

WARNING: WARNING: Residue 168 named PRO of a molecule in the input file
was
mapped to an entry in the topology database, but the atom H used in an
interaction of type dihedral in that entry is not found in the input
file.
Perhaps your atom and/or residue naming needs to be fixed.

This warning is only present when I use the AMBER03 forcefield, all other
forcefields seem to work fine. I have tried this with both a structure
without hydrogens as well as a structure with hydrogens added, both with
and without the -ignh flag. I tried looking at the amber03 database files
as well as the amber99sb-ildn database files (amber99sb-ildn works just
fine), but I could not find any reason why this particular residue would
be
problematic. pdb2gmx does not find any problems with the other proline
residues in the protein (which look identical), so I am puzzled as to
what's causing this.

The proline residue is:
ATOM   1384  N   PRO A 168     274.650  45.241  24.167  1.00180.63
   N
ATOM   1385  CA  PRO A 168     273.508  44.823  23.370  1.00180.63
   C
ATOM   1386  CD  PRO A 168     275.844  45.381  23.346  1.00180.63
   C
ATOM   1387  CB  PRO A 168     274.071  44.405  22.014  1.00180.63
   C
ATOM   1388  CG  PRO A 168     275.381  45.194  21.892  1.00180.63
   C
ATOM   1389  C   PRO A 168     272.551  43.776  23.888  1.00180.63
   C
ATOM   1390  O   PRO A 168     271.478  43.646  23.304  1.00180.63
   O

Does anyone know what's going on here?

Thanks in advance!
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.


--
==================================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==================================================
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Reply via email to