Hi, You might want to read this: http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Cut-off_schemes
Basically, in the past Gromacs kept track of interactions through the group scheme (which made use of charge groups). The more recent verlet scheme doesn't use charge groups - that's what that line is telling you. It's not an error, nor does it mean that your charges are being removed. The link above (or the gromacs manual) should help clarify things. Dries On 20 Feb 2016 5:29 p.m., "Alexander Alexander" <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Gromacs user, > > In my NVT simulation, I user the Verlet as cutoff-scheme, but below note > comes up in screen while .tpr generation; > > "Removing all charge groups because cutoff-scheme=Verlet" > > Does it mean that the atoms which I have indicated a charge for them in > .top file will be removed? or what .. > > Also, how serious is this massage? > > Thanks. > > Cheers, > Alex > -- > Gromacs Users mailing list > > * Please search the archive at > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before > posting! > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or > send a mail to [email protected]. > -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to [email protected].
