On 5/14/16 2:25 AM, Ms. Nikita Bora wrote:
Respected Sir,

Recently i followed your tutorial for simulation of a 50 ns final mdrun of
protein-ligand complex where the value of rvdw=rcoulomb=1.4 was used. The
simulation runned at aorund 10 ns/day . While for the same  complex when
rvdw=rcoulomb=1 is made the run was 10 ns/day.

Sir i would like to know is there any standard value for rvdw,rcoulomb and
why a longer time is taken for 1.4 value


Longer cutoffs = more interactions to compute.

Cutoffs are part of the force field. Don't change them from prescribed values without very strong justification.

-Justin


___________________
D I S C L A I M E R
This e-mail may contain privileged information and is intended solely for
the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail in error and
destroy it from your system. Though considerable effort has been made to
deliver error free e-mail messages but it can not be guaranteed to be secure
or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
delayed, or may contain viruses. The recipient must verify the integrity of
this e-mail message.


--
==================================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==================================================
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Reply via email to