On 10/5/16 8:45 PM, Kelechi Okoroafor wrote:
Thank you very much, James.
My apologies, I miscommunicated myself.

I meant to say that I used NPT simulation to equilibrate the pressure
to 1bar as desired. I had planned to do NVT simulation after the NPT
simulation, expecting the pressure to fluctuate reasonably about the
mean value of 1bar.

Unfortunately, editconf edited the trajectory such that during the NVT
simulation, the pressure fluctuated about the mean value of 900bar
causing the observed unusual behaviour.


I don't see how that's possible. If you move from NPT -> NVT, the ensemble that is preserved is the one that is present in the final snapshot; even if the average over the NPT run is 1 bar, there is no guarantee that instantaneous value is 1 bar, though the density is likely correct.

Where was editconf involved in this process? If you're continuing a run and changing ensemble, you should be invoking grompp -t with the previous checkpoint. Any other use of GROMACS tools introduces discontinuity.

-Justin

--
==================================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==================================================
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Reply via email to