Hi,

I ran minim.mdp for my system with 3456 atoms.  But lowest energy after
minimization is positive.

*here is th screen output*

Step= 4509, Dmax= 4.5e-05 nm, Epot=  4.06554e+02 Fmax= 9.86206e+00, atom=
3521

writing lowest energy coordinates.

Back Off! I just backed up em.gro to ./#em.gro.1#

Steepest Descents converged to Fmax < 10 in 4510 steps
Potential Energy  =  4.0655389e+02
Maximum force     =  9.8620596e+00 on atom 352
Norm of force     =  3.3500545e+00

NOTE: 16 % of the run time was spent in pair search,
      you might want to increase nstlist (this has no effect on accuracy)


*Below is txt of minim.mdp file *

; minim.mdp - used as input into grompp to generate em.tpr
integrator    = steep        ; Algorithm (steep = steepest descent
minimization)
emstep          = 0.01         ; Energy step size
;emtol        = 1000.0      ; Stop minimization when the maximum force <
1000.0 kJ/mol/nm
nsteps        = 500000     ; Maximum number of (minimization) steps to
perform
; Parameters describing how to find the neighbors of each atom and how to
calculate the interactions
nstlist            = 10              ; Frequency to update the neighbor
list and long range forces
rlist            = 2         ; cut-off for making neighbour list (short
range forces)
cutoff-scheme       = Verlet
ns_type            = grid        ; Method to determine neighbor list
(simple, grid)
coulombtype        = PME        ; Treatment of long range electrostatic
interactions
rcoulomb        = 0.9         ; Short-range electrostatic cut-off
rvdw            = 0.9        ; Short-range Van der Waals cut-off
pbc            = xyz         ; Periodic Boundary Conditions (yes/no)



regards
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Reply via email to